Cognitive Dual-Process Theories Applied to Artificial Intelligence

In his 2011 book Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman popularized the dual- process theory of cognition through the distinction between System 1—fast, automatic, and associative—and System 2—slow, deliberate, and rule-based. His research, which integrates economic theory with cognitive psychology, revealed the pervasiveness of cognitive biases and showed how the interaction between these systems can systematically lead to reasoning errors. This article explores the applicability of Kahneman’s dual-process framework to artificial learning systems, particularly in addressing phenomena such as hallucinations and inference failures in large language models. We examine the cognitive mechanisms involved in idea formation at the neural level and propose two postulates that outline the structural challenges in implementing a System 2 analogue in artificial intelligence. Given that machine learning systems rely on mathematical formalisms, we introduce a simplified mathematical model of cognitive processing. This model suggests that an axiomatic understanding of synaptic behaviour may be crucial to identifying and mitigating systematic reasoning flaws in natural language processing systems.

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Dual-Process Theories Applied to Artificial Intelligence

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

Cognitive Dual-Process Theories Applied to Artificial Intelligence

article en

Abstract

In his 2011 book Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman popularized the dual- process theory of cognition through the distinction between System 1—fast, automatic, and associative—and System 2—slow, deliberate, and rule-based. His research, which integrates economic theory with cognitive psychology, revealed the pervasiveness of cognitive biases and showed how the interaction between these systems can systematically lead to reasoning errors. This article explores the applicability of Kahneman’s dual-process framework to artificial learning systems, particularly in addressing phenomena such as hallucinations and inference failures in large language models. We examine the cognitive mechanisms involved in idea formation at the neural level and propose two postulates that outline the structural challenges in implementing a System 2 analogue in artificial intelligence. Given that machine learning systems rely on mathematical formalisms, we introduce a simplified mathematical model of cognitive processing. This model suggests that an axiomatic understanding of synaptic behaviour may be crucial to identifying and mitigating systematic reasoning flaws in natural language processing systems.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cognitive Dual-Process Theories Applied to Artificial Intelligence · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS