Bridging the gap: a researcher’s journey from traditional qualitative methods to tech-driven insights

The integration of technology into qualitative research has introduced transformative opportunities and challenges, prompting researchers to evaluate traditional methods against technology-based approaches. This article examines the strengths, limitations,and effectiveness of these methods, focusing on participant recruitment, interview conduction, and transcription processes. Drawing on researchers’ experiences from two qualitative projects involving breastfeeding mothers, this article compares traditional face-to-face interviews with online methods using platforms such as Zoom and Facebook. The findings reveal that while face-to-face interviews enable deeper interaction and contextual insights, they are logistically demanding and time-intensive. In contrast, technology-based methods enhance accessibility and efficiency, particularly for dispersed populations, yet may compromise non-verbal cues and transcription accuracy. Automated transcription tools, though time-saving, often fail to capture linguistic nuances, requiring manual verification for rigorous analysis. This article concludes that a hybrid approach leveraging the strengths of both methods ensures comprehensive data collection. Best practices for using technology in qualitative research are proposed to ensure the richness and contextual depth of the data while leveraging the benefits of modern tools.

Publication Details

Journal
The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia)
Published
2024-12-30
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the gap: a researcher’s journey from traditional qualitative methods to tech-driven insights

The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia)
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Bridging the gap: a researcher’s journey from traditional qualitative methods to tech-driven insights

article en

Abstract

The integration of technology into qualitative research has introduced transformative opportunities and challenges, prompting researchers to evaluate traditional methods against technology-based approaches. This article examines the strengths, limitations,and effectiveness of these methods, focusing on participant recruitment, interview conduction, and transcription processes. Drawing on researchers’ experiences from two qualitative projects involving breastfeeding mothers, this article compares traditional face-to-face interviews with online methods using platforms such as Zoom and Facebook. The findings reveal that while face-to-face interviews enable deeper interaction and contextual insights, they are logistically demanding and time-intensive. In contrast, technology-based methods enhance accessibility and efficiency, particularly for dispersed populations, yet may compromise non-verbal cues and transcription accuracy. Automated transcription tools, though time-saving, often fail to capture linguistic nuances, requiring manual verification for rigorous analysis. This article concludes that a hybrid approach leveraging the strengths of both methods ensures comprehensive data collection. Best practices for using technology in qualitative research are proposed to ensure the richness and contextual depth of the data while leveraging the benefits of modern tools.

The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.