Boundaries and Conversations: Reflections on a New "New" Diplomatic History

This brief response to the interdisciplinary manifesto “Provincializing ‘New’ Diplomatic History” traces family resemblances between discussions in diplomatic history and in the history of international law, and the shared implication of these discussions in larger questions of how we understand projects of international, global or transnational history. The response probes the Manifesto’s framing of a new “new” diplomatic history, arguing for an approach which is less about drawing lines in new places, further out from a Eurocentric institutional touchstone, and more able to put the multifaceted nature of terms like “diplomacy” in issue as a permanent structural question. In closing, the response explores some of the methodological suggestions made in the Manifesto, including what is at stake in imagining scholarly cooperation itself as diplomacy.

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Historical Influence and Diplomacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boundaries and Conversations: Reflections on a New "New" Diplomatic History

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Historical Influence and Diplomacy
article

Boundaries and Conversations: Reflections on a New "New" Diplomatic History

article en

Abstract

This brief response to the interdisciplinary manifesto “Provincializing ‘New’ Diplomatic History” traces family resemblances between discussions in diplomatic history and in the history of international law, and the shared implication of these discussions in larger questions of how we understand projects of international, global or transnational history. The response probes the Manifesto’s framing of a new “new” diplomatic history, arguing for an approach which is less about drawing lines in new places, further out from a Eurocentric institutional touchstone, and more able to put the multifaceted nature of terms like “diplomacy” in issue as a permanent structural question. In closing, the response explores some of the methodological suggestions made in the Manifesto, including what is at stake in imagining scholarly cooperation itself as diplomacy.

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Historical Influence and Diplomacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.