Can LLMs Reason with Logic?

ChatGPT, a chat interface to OpenAI’s Large Language Model (LLM), amazed users after its release in 2022 with its functionality. However, LLMs are prone to “hallucinations”, which sparked lively debate about LLM reasoning capabilities, which is also the focus of this study. We chose logical inferencing, which is the cognitive process of drawing conclusions from logical assertions. We utilised computational ontologies, which, because of the logical frameworks they employ, provide a comparable reasoning baseline. We developed an ontology with an inconsistent concept, and we provided the same assertions as a zero-shot prompt for several LLMs. Even though all the LLMs provided quite an extensive explanation for their answers, all but two of them failed the basic logical inferencing experiment. The results indicate that reasoning remains a challenge for LLMs but that some of the latest LLMs have progressed significantly in their logical reasoning capabilities.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can LLMs Reason with Logic?

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Can LLMs Reason with Logic?

article en

Abstract

ChatGPT, a chat interface to OpenAI’s Large Language Model (LLM), amazed users after its release in 2022 with its functionality. However, LLMs are prone to “hallucinations”, which sparked lively debate about LLM reasoning capabilities, which is also the focus of this study. We chose logical inferencing, which is the cognitive process of drawing conclusions from logical assertions. We utilised computational ontologies, which, because of the logical frameworks they employ, provide a comparable reasoning baseline. We developed an ontology with an inconsistent concept, and we provided the same assertions as a zero-shot prompt for several LLMs. Even though all the LLMs provided quite an extensive explanation for their answers, all but two of them failed the basic logical inferencing experiment. The results indicate that reasoning remains a challenge for LLMs but that some of the latest LLMs have progressed significantly in their logical reasoning capabilities.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
University of South Africa (ZA), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.