The Art That Makes the AI Artist: AI’s Potential as a Copyright Infringer and Its Future Under a Licensing Requirement

The practices and advancements in the generative AI training process have sent many authors and artists in the creative industry into a panic. In addition to demonstrating output that can rival human-made works, many AI companies rely on copying hundreds of thousands of copyrighted works to teach their AI models. This raises the question of whether AI companies are infringing or if they are permitted to use the work for training purposes under the fair use doctrine. Through current precedent within copyright law and the fair use defense, this note analyzes whether generative AI’s use of copyrighted materials will be defendable under the fair use doctrine. Given the likelihood that certain uses will not be permitted, this note also explores generative AI’s future under licensing requirements.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-04-02
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Art That Makes the AI Artist: AI’s Potential as a Copyright Infringer and Its Future Under a Licensing Requirement

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

The Art That Makes the AI Artist: AI’s Potential as a Copyright Infringer and Its Future Under a Licensing Requirement

article en

Abstract

The practices and advancements in the generative AI training process have sent many authors and artists in the creative industry into a panic. In addition to demonstrating output that can rival human-made works, many AI companies rely on copying hundreds of thousands of copyrighted works to teach their AI models. This raises the question of whether AI companies are infringing or if they are permitted to use the work for training purposes under the fair use doctrine. Through current precedent within copyright law and the fair use defense, this note analyzes whether generative AI’s use of copyrighted materials will be defendable under the fair use doctrine. Given the likelihood that certain uses will not be permitted, this note also explores generative AI’s future under licensing requirements.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Art That Makes the AI Artist: AI’s Potential as a Copyright Infringer and Its Future Under a Licensing Requirement · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS