The Autonomy of Disgust : A Study of Autonomy and Autobiographical Aesthetics in Katarina Frostenson’s K

In this study, I analyse how Katarina Frostenson in her work K (2019) uses her changed position of utterance – which followed from the accusations against her and her husband, Jean-Claude Arnault, during the Swedish “Metoo” – aesthetically. The changed position is thematised in K to affect the question of literary autonomy, and the performative use of the biographical facts that surrounds Frostenson after Metoo creates a position of disgust towards her. With help of theoretical perspectives of Jon Helt Haarder and Sara Ahmed I show how Frostenson uses the feeling of disgust to bring the reader in an unpleasant experience of proximity. At the same time, she tries to save her old aesthetics in the new position, which leads to that both K and Frostenson’s previous works becomes abject. I also argue that the threat of abjection potentially becomes a problem for the profession of literary studies.

Publication Details

Journal
DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Autonomy of Disgust : A Study of Autonomy and Autobiographical Aesthetics in Katarina Frostenson’s K

DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Education and Islamic Studies
article

The Autonomy of Disgust : A Study of Autonomy and Autobiographical Aesthetics in Katarina Frostenson’s K

article en

Abstract

In this study, I analyse how Katarina Frostenson in her work K (2019) uses her changed position of utterance – which followed from the accusations against her and her husband, Jean-Claude Arnault, during the Swedish “Metoo” – aesthetically. The changed position is thematised in K to affect the question of literary autonomy, and the performative use of the biographical facts that surrounds Frostenson after Metoo creates a position of disgust towards her. With help of theoretical perspectives of Jon Helt Haarder and Sara Ahmed I show how Frostenson uses the feeling of disgust to bring the reader in an unpleasant experience of proximity. At the same time, she tries to save her old aesthetics in the new position, which leads to that both K and Frostenson’s previous works becomes abject. I also argue that the threat of abjection potentially becomes a problem for the profession of literary studies.

DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Education and Islamic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.