Assessing Public Support for Generative AI Legislation in California

This study investigates the current climate of public opinion among California voters regarding proposed legislation to establish safety protocols and safeguards for the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in state government operations. As the rapid advancement of GenAI has outpaced the development of comprehensive regulatory frameworks, there is a pressing need to examine whether voters would endorse or reject such legislative proposals upon being informed about the absence of adequate safety measures. The relevant literature surrounding the study informed of proposed safety guidelines for this innovative technology, but no forcing mechanisms or current legislation to support them. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach involving surveys and expert interviews, the research aims to ascertain the potential impact of informing the public about the importance of pre-deployment testing, cybersecurity practices, hacking protections, emergency shut-off commands, and restrictions on deepfakes generated by AI. By assessing public support for these proposed safeguards, the study seeks to inform policymaking and raise awareness about the responsible development and deployment of transformative GenAI technologies.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-08-25
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Public Support for Generative AI Legislation in California

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Assessing Public Support for Generative AI Legislation in California

article en

Abstract

This study investigates the current climate of public opinion among California voters regarding proposed legislation to establish safety protocols and safeguards for the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in state government operations. As the rapid advancement of GenAI has outpaced the development of comprehensive regulatory frameworks, there is a pressing need to examine whether voters would endorse or reject such legislative proposals upon being informed about the absence of adequate safety measures. The relevant literature surrounding the study informed of proposed safety guidelines for this innovative technology, but no forcing mechanisms or current legislation to support them. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach involving surveys and expert interviews, the research aims to ascertain the potential impact of informing the public about the importance of pre-deployment testing, cybersecurity practices, hacking protections, emergency shut-off commands, and restrictions on deepfakes generated by AI. By assessing public support for these proposed safeguards, the study seeks to inform policymaking and raise awareness about the responsible development and deployment of transformative GenAI technologies.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Public Support for Generative AI Legislation in California · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS