Anatomic and Functional Outcomes of Lamellar Macular Hole and Epiretinal Membrane Foveoschisis Surgery: Predictive Factors and Associated Complications — A Retrospective Interventional Study

Yosra Er-reguyeg,1 Sihame Doukkali,2 Mélanie Hébert,2 Eunice Linh You,2 Serge Bourgault,2 Mathieu Caissie,2 Éric Tourville,2 Ali Dirani2 1Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Saint-Sacrement, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, CanadaCorrespondence: Ali Dirani, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, 1050 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC, D2-44C, Canada, Tel +1 418 525 4444, Email [email protected]: To analyze the anatomic and functional outcomes of lamellar macular hole (LMH) and epiretinal membrane foveoschisis (ERMF) surgery.Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective interventional cohort study of ninety patients with unilateral idiopathic LMH or ERMF who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with membrane peeling between 2014 and 2021. We evaluated the anatomic and functional success of PPV with membrane peeling for treating LMH and ERMF, compared surgical outcomes between the two entities, and identified predictive factors for anatomical and functional success. Primary outcomes included final postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and LMH or ERMF closure. Variables associated with final BCVA were assessed using a multiple linear regression model.Results: 51 subjects presented with ERMF, while 39 presented with LMH. LMH or ERMF closure occurred in 80 cases. LMH cases had a lower rate of closure (LMH closure rate: 76.9%, vs ERMF closure rate: 98.0%, p=0.002) and were more at risk of developing a postoperative macular hole (p=0.008). A significant difference was observed between median [Q1, Q3] preoperative BCVA (0.42 [0.26, 0.61] logMAR) and final BCVA (0.31 [0.14, 0.48] logMAR, p=0.024). BCVA varied from 0.52 [0.40, 0.74] logMAR preoperatively to 0.36 [0.30, 0.66] logMAR postoperatively in the LMH subgroup (p=0.060), and from 0.32 [0.20, 0.54] logMAR preoperatively to 0.22 [0.10, 0.40] logMAR postoperatively in the ERMF subgroup (p=0.146). LMH without epiretinal proliferation (β=0.194, p=0.040) was associated with worse final BCVA in multivariate analysis.Conclusion: Results support the effectiveness of PPV as a treatment for LMH. LMHs had worse anatomic outcomes than ERMFs.Keywords: epiretinal membrane foveoschisis, pars plana vitrectomy, epiretinal proliferation peeling, internal limiting membrane peeling, vitreoretinal surgery, retina

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Retinal and Macular Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anatomic and Functional Outcomes of Lamellar Macular Hole and Epiretinal Membrane Foveoschisis Surgery: Predictive Factors and Associated Complications — A Retrospective Interventional Study

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Retinal and Macular Surgery
article

Anatomic and Functional Outcomes of Lamellar Macular Hole and Epiretinal Membrane Foveoschisis Surgery: Predictive Factors and Associated Complications — A Retrospective Interventional Study

article en

Abstract

Yosra Er-reguyeg,1 Sihame Doukkali,2 Mélanie Hébert,2 Eunice Linh You,2 Serge Bourgault,2 Mathieu Caissie,2 Éric Tourville,2 Ali Dirani2 1Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Saint-Sacrement, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, CanadaCorrespondence: Ali Dirani, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, 1050 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC, D2-44C, Canada, Tel +1 418 525 4444, Email [email protected]: To analyze the anatomic and functional outcomes of lamellar macular hole (LMH) and epiretinal membrane foveoschisis (ERMF) surgery.Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective interventional cohort study of ninety patients with unilateral idiopathic LMH or ERMF who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with membrane peeling between 2014 and 2021. We evaluated the anatomic and functional success of PPV with membrane peeling for treating LMH and ERMF, compared surgical outcomes between the two entities, and identified predictive factors for anatomical and functional success. Primary outcomes included final postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and LMH or ERMF closure. Variables associated with final BCVA were assessed using a multiple linear regression model.Results: 51 subjects presented with ERMF, while 39 presented with LMH. LMH or ERMF closure occurred in 80 cases. LMH cases had a lower rate of closure (LMH closure rate: 76.9%, vs ERMF closure rate: 98.0%, p=0.002) and were more at risk of developing a postoperative macular hole (p=0.008). A significant difference was observed between median [Q1, Q3] preoperative BCVA (0.42 [0.26, 0.61] logMAR) and final BCVA (0.31 [0.14, 0.48] logMAR, p=0.024). BCVA varied from 0.52 [0.40, 0.74] logMAR preoperatively to 0.36 [0.30, 0.66] logMAR postoperatively in the LMH subgroup (p=0.060), and from 0.32 [0.20, 0.54] logMAR preoperatively to 0.22 [0.10, 0.40] logMAR postoperatively in the ERMF subgroup (p=0.146). LMH without epiretinal proliferation (β=0.194, p=0.040) was associated with worse final BCVA in multivariate analysis.Conclusion: Results support the effectiveness of PPV as a treatment for LMH. LMHs had worse anatomic outcomes than ERMFs.Keywords: epiretinal membrane foveoschisis, pars plana vitrectomy, epiretinal proliferation peeling, internal limiting membrane peeling, vitreoretinal surgery, retina

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Retinal and Macular Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.