Artificial Intelligence in Mental Healthcare: Adoption, Perception, and Strategic Implementation : A Mixed-Methods Study of Clinician Experiences and Organizational Readiness

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds significant potential to transform mental healthcare. This thesis investigates how mental healthcare professionals perceive and experience the integration of an AI-based “clinical co-pilot” tool designed to support clinical documentation within their daily routines. Understanding how clinicians perceive and integrate AI tools into their workflows is critical for successful implementation and sustainable digital transformation. Methods: This study employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. A quantitative survey was completed by 93 mental healthcare professionals to assess attitudes toward an AI-based clinical documentation tool. This was followed by semi-structured interviews with 8 unit-level managers, exploring the factors that influence AI adoption and integration in clinical practice. The study drew on multiple theoretical perspectives, including systemic and organizational-level theories, professional and workplace-level theories, individual behavioral theories, and cognitive and psychological theories. This comprehensive, multi-theoretical approach facilitated a deep exploration of the various factors influencing AI adoption. Results: The findings revealed that healthcare professionals' willingness to recommend the AI tool was strongly associated with perceptions of practical utility, educational support, and preserved clinical autonomy. Significant variability in AI adoption was observed across different professional roles, age, and prior experience, with local leadership, organizational culture, and clinical context emerging as key factors. Business Insights: The study provides actionable recommendations for organizations seeking to enhance AI adoption. These include developing comprehensive training programs and maintaining clinicians' professional autonomy, while carefully balancing individual adaptation with organizational cohesion. Empowering leadership and fostering a strong organizational culture at all levels are also essential. In addition,establishing a clear governance structure and ongoing monitoring of key performance indicators (KPIs) are critical for sustained AI adoption. Conclusion: Successful AI adoption in mental healthcare is not solely a technical challenge but a complex process shaped by human, organizational, and contextual factors. By understanding these dynamics, organizations can develop more effective strategies for integrating AI into clinical workflows, ensuring both improved patient care and optimized operational efficiency.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Mental Healthcare: Adoption, Perception, and Strategic Implementation : A Mixed-Methods Study of Clinician Experiences and Organizational Readiness

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial Intelligence in Mental Healthcare: Adoption, Perception, and Strategic Implementation : A Mixed-Methods Study of Clinician Experiences and Organizational Readiness

article en

Abstract

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds significant potential to transform mental healthcare. This thesis investigates how mental healthcare professionals perceive and experience the integration of an AI-based “clinical co-pilot” tool designed to support clinical documentation within their daily routines. Understanding how clinicians perceive and integrate AI tools into their workflows is critical for successful implementation and sustainable digital transformation. Methods: This study employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. A quantitative survey was completed by 93 mental healthcare professionals to assess attitudes toward an AI-based clinical documentation tool. This was followed by semi-structured interviews with 8 unit-level managers, exploring the factors that influence AI adoption and integration in clinical practice. The study drew on multiple theoretical perspectives, including systemic and organizational-level theories, professional and workplace-level theories, individual behavioral theories, and cognitive and psychological theories. This comprehensive, multi-theoretical approach facilitated a deep exploration of the various factors influencing AI adoption. Results: The findings revealed that healthcare professionals' willingness to recommend the AI tool was strongly associated with perceptions of practical utility, educational support, and preserved clinical autonomy. Significant variability in AI adoption was observed across different professional roles, age, and prior experience, with local leadership, organizational culture, and clinical context emerging as key factors. Business Insights: The study provides actionable recommendations for organizations seeking to enhance AI adoption. These include developing comprehensive training programs and maintaining clinicians' professional autonomy, while carefully balancing individual adaptation with organizational cohesion. Empowering leadership and fostering a strong organizational culture at all levels are also essential. In addition,establishing a clear governance structure and ongoing monitoring of key performance indicators (KPIs) are critical for sustained AI adoption. Conclusion: Successful AI adoption in mental healthcare is not solely a technical challenge but a complex process shaped by human, organizational, and contextual factors. By understanding these dynamics, organizations can develop more effective strategies for integrating AI into clinical workflows, ensuring both improved patient care and optimized operational efficiency.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.