Artificial Afterlife: Philosophical Reflections on Griefbots

AI-powered chatbots are increasingly used in many contexts and for a variety of purposes. Among these uses, a particularly interesting one involves the so-called griefbots – that is, chatbots impersonating dead persons in the form of an artificial interlocutor. While they might help us process the loss of a beloved person, griefbots are not free from risks and may give rise to ethical concerns. This work aims at expanding the existing philosophical debate on griefbots. After providing a brief introduction to griefbots as well as the philosophical debate on their use, we provide an analysis of the way they may give rise to problematic ethical and normative tension between different transparency requirements. Then, we emphasise how the assessment of the related risks should adequately account for the dimension of users’ vulnerability.

Publication Details

Journal
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Afterlife: Philosophical Reflections on Griefbots

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Afterlife: Philosophical Reflections on Griefbots

article en

Abstract

AI-powered chatbots are increasingly used in many contexts and for a variety of purposes. Among these uses, a particularly interesting one involves the so-called griefbots – that is, chatbots impersonating dead persons in the form of an artificial interlocutor. While they might help us process the loss of a beloved person, griefbots are not free from risks and may give rise to ethical concerns. This work aims at expanding the existing philosophical debate on griefbots. After providing a brief introduction to griefbots as well as the philosophical debate on their use, we provide an analysis of the way they may give rise to problematic ethical and normative tension between different transparency requirements. Then, we emphasise how the assessment of the related risks should adequately account for the dimension of users’ vulnerability.

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Afterlife: Philosophical Reflections on Griefbots · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS