Anti-abortion Law or Illegal Human Life Support Conscription?

This Article introduces the idea that forced fetal life support in a state that bans abortion is unpaid state-conscripted human life support (“USCHLS”) by the hosts. It reviews how the Dobbs decision resulted in USCHLS, unpaid work, which violates the U.S. Constitution’s Thirteenth Amendment protection against “involuntary servitude.” Additionally, USCHLS constitutes a per se taking which violates the “Takings Clause” of the Fifth Amendment. This Article suggests sexual activity insurance might alleviate some of the problems with USCHLS, but not all of them. To date, no U.S. federal or state government offers the G.I. bill, a state equivalent, or service pay for USCHLS work. As long as the U.S. and state governments compensate military, state police, and other recruits for their service in the preservation of American civilian life, then a failure to pay USCHLS hosts violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It also violates Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Conceivably, other people might in the future experience state conscription without consent or compensation. For example, people with a spare lung, an extra kidney, bone marrow, a rare blood type, and other needed body parts—i.e., all of us—should be protected from USCHLS of other living people or fetuses. In sum, the goal of this Article is to demonstrate that USCHLS violates the Constitution. Rather than rely solely on the 14th Amendment and notions of privacy found in liberty, this Article explores alternative constitutional protections.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti-abortion Law or Illegal Human Life Support Conscription?

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
article

Anti-abortion Law or Illegal Human Life Support Conscription?

article en

Abstract

This Article introduces the idea that forced fetal life support in a state that bans abortion is unpaid state-conscripted human life support (“USCHLS”) by the hosts. It reviews how the Dobbs decision resulted in USCHLS, unpaid work, which violates the U.S. Constitution’s Thirteenth Amendment protection against “involuntary servitude.” Additionally, USCHLS constitutes a per se taking which violates the “Takings Clause” of the Fifth Amendment. This Article suggests sexual activity insurance might alleviate some of the problems with USCHLS, but not all of them. To date, no U.S. federal or state government offers the G.I. bill, a state equivalent, or service pay for USCHLS work. As long as the U.S. and state governments compensate military, state police, and other recruits for their service in the preservation of American civilian life, then a failure to pay USCHLS hosts violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It also violates Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Conceivably, other people might in the future experience state conscription without consent or compensation. For example, people with a spare lung, an extra kidney, bone marrow, a rare blood type, and other needed body parts—i.e., all of us—should be protected from USCHLS of other living people or fetuses. In sum, the goal of this Article is to demonstrate that USCHLS violates the Constitution. Rather than rely solely on the 14th Amendment and notions of privacy found in liberty, this Article explores alternative constitutional protections.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.