Application of the Sports Technology Research Network Validation Framework to Evaluate Wearable Heart Rate Monitors for the Management of Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) affects over 6.1 million people worldwide and is characterized by progressive dopaminergic neurodegeneration in the substantia nigra, contributing to motor symptoms and reduced quality of life. Aerobic exercise at intensities near 80% HRmax promotes dopamine release and neuroplasticity, making heart rate (HR)-guided training a promising therapeutic strategy. Although the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) is commonly used to estimate intensity, it lacks precision for monitoring real-time training load. Wearable HR monitors offer an objective alternative; however, limited validation exists in exercise contexts relevant to clinical populations such as PD. PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of three commercial HR monitors (Polar, Garmin, WHOOP) compared to a gold-standard ECG (GE Dash 5000) during treadmill-based aerobic exercise in a healthy cohort, to inform future application in PD rehabilitation. METHODS: In this IRB-approved study (#2113291-4), 45 healthy adults completed a standardized treadmill protocol while HR was recorded every 10 seconds. Accuracy was evaluated using concordance correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Polar showed the highest agreement with ECG (r² = 0.71), followed by Garmin (r² = 0.62) and WHOOP (r² = 0.26). WHOOP exhibited the greatest variability (SD = 19.86), especially at HRs above 125 BPM. Data loss rates were 11.5% (ECG), 2.5% (Polar), 5.3% (Garmin), and 19.6% (WHOOP). Polar and Garmin exhibited substantially lower variability compared to WHOOP (19.86), with SDs of 10.80 and 12.55, respectively. CONCLUSION: Among the devices tested, Polar provided the most accurate and consistent HR data relative to ECG. Validating wearable monitors in a healthy population performing structured aerobic exercise is a critical step toward safely integrating HR-guided training into PD rehabilitation, where precision is essential for driving neuroplastic adaptation.

Publication Details

Journal
TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Published
2025-05-07
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of the Sports Technology Research Network Validation Framework to Evaluate Wearable Heart Rate Monitors for the Management of Parkinson's Disease

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Application of the Sports Technology Research Network Validation Framework to Evaluate Wearable Heart Rate Monitors for the Management of Parkinson's Disease

article en

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) affects over 6.1 million people worldwide and is characterized by progressive dopaminergic neurodegeneration in the substantia nigra, contributing to motor symptoms and reduced quality of life. Aerobic exercise at intensities near 80% HRmax promotes dopamine release and neuroplasticity, making heart rate (HR)-guided training a promising therapeutic strategy. Although the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) is commonly used to estimate intensity, it lacks precision for monitoring real-time training load. Wearable HR monitors offer an objective alternative; however, limited validation exists in exercise contexts relevant to clinical populations such as PD. PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of three commercial HR monitors (Polar, Garmin, WHOOP) compared to a gold-standard ECG (GE Dash 5000) during treadmill-based aerobic exercise in a healthy cohort, to inform future application in PD rehabilitation. METHODS: In this IRB-approved study (#2113291-4), 45 healthy adults completed a standardized treadmill protocol while HR was recorded every 10 seconds. Accuracy was evaluated using concordance correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Polar showed the highest agreement with ECG (r² = 0.71), followed by Garmin (r² = 0.62) and WHOOP (r² = 0.26). WHOOP exhibited the greatest variability (SD = 19.86), especially at HRs above 125 BPM. Data loss rates were 11.5% (ECG), 2.5% (Polar), 5.3% (Garmin), and 19.6% (WHOOP). Polar and Garmin exhibited substantially lower variability compared to WHOOP (19.86), with SDs of 10.80 and 12.55, respectively. CONCLUSION: Among the devices tested, Polar provided the most accurate and consistent HR data relative to ECG. Validating wearable monitors in a healthy population performing structured aerobic exercise is a critical step toward safely integrating HR-guided training into PD rehabilitation, where precision is essential for driving neuroplastic adaptation.

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.