Analysis of American Airlines Flight 965: Human Factors and Safety Implications

This case study examines the human factors that contributed to the crash of American Airlines flight 965, a Boeing 757 that impacted mountainous terrain near Cali, Colombia, in December 1995, resulting in 151 fatalities. Applying the People, Environment, Actions, Resources (PEAR) model—a framework that evaluates interactions between individuals and their operational environment—the study focuses on the critical role of "Actions" in the crew's decision-making during the final approach. The analysis identifies key errors, including misjudgments in navigation, failure to follow standard operating procedures, and improper management of cockpit resources. These actions, exacerbated by environmental challenges such as difficult terrain and weather conditions, were central to the accident. The study highlights the need for improved training in decision-making and situational awareness, emphasizing that better protocols could have prevented the crew’s failure to recognize the impending danger in time. By isolating "Actions" in the PEAR framework, the case provides insights into how human error in high-pressure situations can significantly affect flight safety. Recommendations are made for enhancing pilot training, focusing on navigation, communication, and resource management to reduce future accidents. This study underscores the importance of addressing human factors in aviation to improve flight safety.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)
Published
2025-01-22
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of American Airlines Flight 965: Human Factors and Safety Implications

Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Analysis of American Airlines Flight 965: Human Factors and Safety Implications

article en

Abstract

This case study examines the human factors that contributed to the crash of American Airlines flight 965, a Boeing 757 that impacted mountainous terrain near Cali, Colombia, in December 1995, resulting in 151 fatalities. Applying the People, Environment, Actions, Resources (PEAR) model—a framework that evaluates interactions between individuals and their operational environment—the study focuses on the critical role of "Actions" in the crew's decision-making during the final approach. The analysis identifies key errors, including misjudgments in navigation, failure to follow standard operating procedures, and improper management of cockpit resources. These actions, exacerbated by environmental challenges such as difficult terrain and weather conditions, were central to the accident. The study highlights the need for improved training in decision-making and situational awareness, emphasizing that better protocols could have prevented the crew’s failure to recognize the impending danger in time. By isolating "Actions" in the PEAR framework, the case provides insights into how human error in high-pressure situations can significantly affect flight safety. Recommendations are made for enhancing pilot training, focusing on navigation, communication, and resource management to reduce future accidents. This study underscores the importance of addressing human factors in aviation to improve flight safety.

Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.