Análisis comparativo de patrones de flujo en toberas planas y cónicas fuera de diseño

This study aims to analyze the behavior of Mach number and pressure field flow patterns in off-design planar and conical nozzles with a divergent half-angle of 10.85°. Numerical simulations of the flow field were conducted using the ANSYS-Fluent R16.2 software, employing the RANS model and the SAS turbulence model under transient flow conditions. The nozzle pressure ratios (NPR) ranged from 1.97 to 8.91. The results reveal differences in flow patterns, including Mach number and static pressure, between the two nozzle types. Notably, normal shock fronts exhibited varying positions for the same NPR values. The maximum peak flow fluctuation along the centerline of the conical nozzle's divergent section reached Mach 2.844, compared to Mach 2.011 in the planar nozzle, indicating lower flow velocity in the latter. At the nozzle outlet, the flow velocity of the conical nozzle was Mach 2.535, representing a 27.32% increase compared to the planar nozzle, which achieved Mach 1.991. Additionally, the throat area significantly influenced mass flow transit, with the planar nozzle having a larger throat area than the conical nozzle. These findings provide insights into the impact of nozzle geometry on flow characteristics under off-design conditions.

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Military Technology and Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Análisis comparativo de patrones de flujo en toberas planas y cónicas fuera de diseño

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Military Technology and Strategies
article

Análisis comparativo de patrones de flujo en toberas planas y cónicas fuera de diseño

article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the behavior of Mach number and pressure field flow patterns in off-design planar and conical nozzles with a divergent half-angle of 10.85°. Numerical simulations of the flow field were conducted using the ANSYS-Fluent R16.2 software, employing the RANS model and the SAS turbulence model under transient flow conditions. The nozzle pressure ratios (NPR) ranged from 1.97 to 8.91. The results reveal differences in flow patterns, including Mach number and static pressure, between the two nozzle types. Notably, normal shock fronts exhibited varying positions for the same NPR values. The maximum peak flow fluctuation along the centerline of the conical nozzle's divergent section reached Mach 2.844, compared to Mach 2.011 in the planar nozzle, indicating lower flow velocity in the latter. At the nozzle outlet, the flow velocity of the conical nozzle was Mach 2.535, representing a 27.32% increase compared to the planar nozzle, which achieved Mach 1.991. Additionally, the throat area significantly influenced mass flow transit, with the planar nozzle having a larger throat area than the conical nozzle. These findings provide insights into the impact of nozzle geometry on flow characteristics under off-design conditions.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Military Technology and Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Análisis comparativo de patrones de flujo en toberas planas y cónicas fuera de diseño · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS