用多种方法评估墨西哥一所大学教学发展的体制背景

Introduction: This study is based on the Model for the Evaluation of Teaching Competencies (MECD), which includes four dimensions: (a) planning of the teaching-learning process; (b) execution of the teaching-learning process; (c) assessment of the impact of the teaching-learning process; and (d) institutional context for teaching development. Specifically, the study presents results related to the evaluation of the last dimension in a public organization in southeastern Mexico, from the perspective of undergraduate students in four academic programs at a public university. Method: The “Assessment of Context Variables from the Students’ Perspective” instrument was used to examine the perceptions of 970 undergraduate students from the faculties of Education, Law, Mathematics, and Nursing. Results: Students positively evaluated various aspects of the institutional context, although variations were observed across faculties. Regarding elements of the teaching-learning process, the results reflected an overall positive evaluation with an average score of 4.0. However, differences were noted between faculties: Education scored 4.3, Law 3.64, Mathematics 3.92, and Nursing 4.30. Focus group interviews provided additional perspectives not captured by the questionnaires. These emerging aspects of the context are significant for improving teaching and student learning. Conclusions: Overall, this study provides a detailed view of how university students perceive and evaluate the institutional context and elements of the teaching-learning process across different faculties, highlighting both strengths and areas requiring further attention to optimize the quality of education.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
e-rph (University of Granada)
Published
2024-12-31
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

用多种方法评估墨西哥一所大学教学发展的体制背景

e-rph (University of Granada)
Knowledge Management in Higher Education
article

用多种方法评估墨西哥一所大学教学发展的体制背景

article en

Abstract

Introduction: This study is based on the Model for the Evaluation of Teaching Competencies (MECD), which includes four dimensions: (a) planning of the teaching-learning process; (b) execution of the teaching-learning process; (c) assessment of the impact of the teaching-learning process; and (d) institutional context for teaching development. Specifically, the study presents results related to the evaluation of the last dimension in a public organization in southeastern Mexico, from the perspective of undergraduate students in four academic programs at a public university. Method: The “Assessment of Context Variables from the Students’ Perspective” instrument was used to examine the perceptions of 970 undergraduate students from the faculties of Education, Law, Mathematics, and Nursing. Results: Students positively evaluated various aspects of the institutional context, although variations were observed across faculties. Regarding elements of the teaching-learning process, the results reflected an overall positive evaluation with an average score of 4.0. However, differences were noted between faculties: Education scored 4.3, Law 3.64, Mathematics 3.92, and Nursing 4.30. Focus group interviews provided additional perspectives not captured by the questionnaires. These emerging aspects of the context are significant for improving teaching and student learning. Conclusions: Overall, this study provides a detailed view of how university students perceive and evaluate the institutional context and elements of the teaching-learning process across different faculties, highlighting both strengths and areas requiring further attention to optimize the quality of education.

e-rph (University of Granada)
Autonomous University of Yucatán (MX)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Knowledge Management in Higher Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

用多种方法评估墨西哥一所大学教学发展的体制背景 · e-rph (University of Granada) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS