When Machines are Learning, Why Not Humans? A Study Examining Roadcraft Training by AI Coaches

Traditionally, defensive driving education and assessments have been administered within driving schools, with certain professionals mandating routine safety training. However, the efficacy of traditional driving education and assessment is limited by the availability of human resources. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising avenues for overcoming this personnel bottleneck. This short paper outlines a study that contributes to the discourse on stereotypes and biases beyond the foundational aspects of artificial intelligence. Prior studies have extensively investigated and illuminated issues concerning gender and racial biases inherent in AI recommendations and analyses. However, a critical underlying cause of these challenges is that AI is engineered to emulate the human decision-making processes. This study offers a novel perspective by considering potential constructive applications of such inherent biases. Furthermore, by systematically examining the generalizability of non-human agents, this study aims to raise awareness, if not underscore, of the significance of these fundamental human limitations.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Machines are Learning, Why Not Humans? A Study Examining Roadcraft Training by AI Coaches

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
article

When Machines are Learning, Why Not Humans? A Study Examining Roadcraft Training by AI Coaches

article en

Abstract

Traditionally, defensive driving education and assessments have been administered within driving schools, with certain professionals mandating routine safety training. However, the efficacy of traditional driving education and assessment is limited by the availability of human resources. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising avenues for overcoming this personnel bottleneck. This short paper outlines a study that contributes to the discourse on stereotypes and biases beyond the foundational aspects of artificial intelligence. Prior studies have extensively investigated and illuminated issues concerning gender and racial biases inherent in AI recommendations and analyses. However, a critical underlying cause of these challenges is that AI is engineered to emulate the human decision-making processes. This study offers a novel perspective by considering potential constructive applications of such inherent biases. Furthermore, by systematically examining the generalizability of non-human agents, this study aims to raise awareness, if not underscore, of the significance of these fundamental human limitations.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Machines are Learning, Why Not Humans? A Study Examining Roadcraft Training by AI Coaches · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS