Working Paper No. 95, Jeremy Bentham and English Common Law

This inquiry seeks to establish that in his book, The Theory of Legislation [1802], author Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) critiqued English Common Law while also posing solutions and alternatives. The first part of this inquiry considers Bentham’s critique of the degrees of vagueness and confusion that could be associated with what is noted as “Common Law” with its emphasis upon the “principle of expectation.” In addition, this inquiry introduces and considers Bentham’s warnings against uses associated with the English legal system and its emphasis upon the importance of “precedent,” as this emphasis is argued to open risks for abuse by courts and their judges. Finally, this inquiry considers Bentham’s proposed solutions rooted in what he advanced as “utilitarianbased suggestions.” Notably, Bentham purported that all of law should be measured through its alignment what he advanced as his “principle of utility."

Publication Details

Journal
PDXScholar (Portland State University)
Published
2025-06-15
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working Paper No. 95, Jeremy Bentham and English Common Law

PDXScholar (Portland State University)
Legal principles and applications
article

Working Paper No. 95, Jeremy Bentham and English Common Law

article en

Abstract

This inquiry seeks to establish that in his book, The Theory of Legislation [1802], author Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) critiqued English Common Law while also posing solutions and alternatives. The first part of this inquiry considers Bentham’s critique of the degrees of vagueness and confusion that could be associated with what is noted as “Common Law” with its emphasis upon the “principle of expectation.” In addition, this inquiry introduces and considers Bentham’s warnings against uses associated with the English legal system and its emphasis upon the importance of “precedent,” as this emphasis is argued to open risks for abuse by courts and their judges. Finally, this inquiry considers Bentham’s proposed solutions rooted in what he advanced as “utilitarianbased suggestions.” Notably, Bentham purported that all of law should be measured through its alignment what he advanced as his “principle of utility."

PDXScholar (Portland State University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.