Wildfire and Social Media: Examining Wildfire Visual Communication Through Tweets

The rise of social media has provided outlets where the public can interreact and share information in efficient and accessible ways, especially during natural disasters. However, there is little known about the way that people are communicating about wildfires on social media, primarily X (formerly twitter). This study aims to answer two questions (1) how do Twitter users in the Wildland Urban Interface react (through text) to various types of wildfire visual content? and (2) how does User Generated Content engagement compare to that of official government agencies or other organizations? Tweets were collected from three communities in California, New Mexico, and Idaho that experienced wildfire in 2022. Images and related text were sorted using two codebooks, and a chi-square test of independence was conducted to analyze image and text relationships. Engagement was analyzed using a two-sample t-test. Results highlight the importance of visual components when communicating about wildfire, and the current state of non-User Generated Content engagement.

Publication Details

Journal
ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wildfire and Social Media: Examining Wildfire Visual Communication Through Tweets

ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Wildfire and Social Media: Examining Wildfire Visual Communication Through Tweets

article en

Abstract

The rise of social media has provided outlets where the public can interreact and share information in efficient and accessible ways, especially during natural disasters. However, there is little known about the way that people are communicating about wildfires on social media, primarily X (formerly twitter). This study aims to answer two questions (1) how do Twitter users in the Wildland Urban Interface react (through text) to various types of wildfire visual content? and (2) how does User Generated Content engagement compare to that of official government agencies or other organizations? Tweets were collected from three communities in California, New Mexico, and Idaho that experienced wildfire in 2022. Images and related text were sorted using two codebooks, and a chi-square test of independence was conducted to analyze image and text relationships. Engagement was analyzed using a two-sample t-test. Results highlight the importance of visual components when communicating about wildfire, and the current state of non-User Generated Content engagement.

ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.