Who is in Charge? Examining the role of managerial control in AI-enabled and open strategy-making

The integration of open strategy and artificial intelligence (AI) in strategic decision-making presents both opportunities and challenges for organisations. While open strategy fosters transparency and inclusiveness by engaging internal and external stakeholders, AI enhances strategic analysis and formulation through data-driven insights. However, these approaches also introduce concerns about managerial control, as they can redistribute decision-making authority, reduce strategic differentiation, and challenge competitive advantage. This study examines the impact of managerial control levels on the effectiveness of AI-enabled and open strategy approaches. Using a 2×2+1 experimental design, strategy experts are assigned to different strategy-making conditions (open, closed, or AI-generated) under high or low managerial control settings. The findings will contribute to understanding how varying levels of control influence the quality and adaptability of strategic outcomes, offering practical insights for organisations navigating the evolving landscape of AI-driven and open strategic processes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who is in Charge? Examining the role of managerial control in AI-enabled and open strategy-making

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Who is in Charge? Examining the role of managerial control in AI-enabled and open strategy-making

article en

Abstract

The integration of open strategy and artificial intelligence (AI) in strategic decision-making presents both opportunities and challenges for organisations. While open strategy fosters transparency and inclusiveness by engaging internal and external stakeholders, AI enhances strategic analysis and formulation through data-driven insights. However, these approaches also introduce concerns about managerial control, as they can redistribute decision-making authority, reduce strategic differentiation, and challenge competitive advantage. This study examines the impact of managerial control levels on the effectiveness of AI-enabled and open strategy approaches. Using a 2×2+1 experimental design, strategy experts are assigned to different strategy-making conditions (open, closed, or AI-generated) under high or low managerial control settings. The findings will contribute to understanding how varying levels of control influence the quality and adaptability of strategic outcomes, offering practical insights for organisations navigating the evolving landscape of AI-driven and open strategic processes.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Macquarie University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who is in Charge? Examining the role of managerial control in AI-enabled and open strategy-making · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS