Two-year clinical performance of an alkasite direct restorative material in Class I and II cavities without using an adhesive resin: A prospective single-arm clinical trial

PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical performance of an alkasite material for Class I and Class II cavities. METHODS 50 subjects (30 females, 20 males; mean age: 28.7) referred to the Department of Restorative Dentistry, Medipol University, Dental School, Istanbul, Turkey, received 89 Class I and II restorations (Cention N) by two trained operators. All restorations were made in bulk application without an adhesive resin and without photo-polymerization. RESULTS 65 restorations were followed in 37 subjects at a 2-year recall. The mean observation period was 27.6 months. 24 restorations (13 subjects) were not followed up at the 2-year recall and were considered as drop out. The restorations were made either due to primary caries (n= 73) or restoration replacement (n= 16). 89 restorations were placed of which 51 were in the maxilla and 38 in the mandible. In deep cavities, a cavity liner was applied (with n= 53; without n= 36). Hypersensitivity was observed in nine cases that disappeared at the latest after 1 month. No debonding, no fracture, and no endodontic complications were observed at 6-month and 1-year recalls whereas four partial retention losses and one pulpal complication occurred at the 2-year recall. The overall survival rate was 88.9% with a mean observation time of 27.6 months (Kaplan-Meier, Log Rank; Mantel-Cox) (95%CI=31.07-32.25). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE This study provided promising evidence for application of alkasite material applied in bulk without retentive features, etching or an adhesive system.

Publication Details

Journal
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-year clinical performance of an alkasite direct restorative material in Class I and II cavities without using an adhesive resin: A prospective single-arm clinical trial

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Dental materials and restorations
article

Two-year clinical performance of an alkasite direct restorative material in Class I and II cavities without using an adhesive resin: A prospective single-arm clinical trial

article en

Abstract

PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical performance of an alkasite material for Class I and Class II cavities. METHODS 50 subjects (30 females, 20 males; mean age: 28.7) referred to the Department of Restorative Dentistry, Medipol University, Dental School, Istanbul, Turkey, received 89 Class I and II restorations (Cention N) by two trained operators. All restorations were made in bulk application without an adhesive resin and without photo-polymerization. RESULTS 65 restorations were followed in 37 subjects at a 2-year recall. The mean observation period was 27.6 months. 24 restorations (13 subjects) were not followed up at the 2-year recall and were considered as drop out. The restorations were made either due to primary caries (n= 73) or restoration replacement (n= 16). 89 restorations were placed of which 51 were in the maxilla and 38 in the mandible. In deep cavities, a cavity liner was applied (with n= 53; without n= 36). Hypersensitivity was observed in nine cases that disappeared at the latest after 1 month. No debonding, no fracture, and no endodontic complications were observed at 6-month and 1-year recalls whereas four partial retention losses and one pulpal complication occurred at the 2-year recall. The overall survival rate was 88.9% with a mean observation time of 27.6 months (Kaplan-Meier, Log Rank; Mantel-Cox) (95%CI=31.07-32.25). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE This study provided promising evidence for application of alkasite material applied in bulk without retentive features, etching or an adhesive system.

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Two-year clinical performance of an alkasite direct restorative material in Class I and II cavities without using an adhesive resin: A prospective single-arm clinical trial · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS