Simplified texts and second language learners : Investigating the differences between easy Swedish and authentic literature

This study examined the differences between a fictional book, suitable to use for educational purposes, and a different version of the same book written in “easy Swedish”. The differences were studied based on six chosen linguistic criteria. Based on these results the study also answered the questions of which book was actually easier to read from a second language perspective and what consequences these differences could have for the reading comprehension of second language students. To answer these questions a comparative text analysis was used. The results showed that the easy-to-read book had shorter sentences, a lower share of long and abstract adjectives and fewer conjunctions. The book marked as “easy to read” was not considered easier to read than the original version. The original version was shown to be more favorable to the reading comprehension of second language learners as they often benefit from authentic texts.

Publication Details

Journal
DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simplified texts and second language learners : Investigating the differences between easy Swedish and authentic literature

DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Simplified texts and second language learners : Investigating the differences between easy Swedish and authentic literature

article en

Abstract

This study examined the differences between a fictional book, suitable to use for educational purposes, and a different version of the same book written in “easy Swedish”. The differences were studied based on six chosen linguistic criteria. Based on these results the study also answered the questions of which book was actually easier to read from a second language perspective and what consequences these differences could have for the reading comprehension of second language students. To answer these questions a comparative text analysis was used. The results showed that the easy-to-read book had shorter sentences, a lower share of long and abstract adjectives and fewer conjunctions. The book marked as “easy to read” was not considered easier to read than the original version. The original version was shown to be more favorable to the reading comprehension of second language learners as they often benefit from authentic texts.

DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Simplified texts and second language learners : Investigating the differences between easy Swedish and authentic literature · DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS