Stakeholder engagement with AI service interactions

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have ushered in a wave of AI innovations in the form of embodied conversational agents (ECAs). These stakeholders offer new ways to engage customers in the co-creation of services but still face significant customer skepticism. To address this challenge, we frame interactions between customers and ECAs through the lens of stakeholder engagement and apply the concept of proxy agency from social cognitive theory. This framework allows us to identify two primary stakeholder roles for ECAs: partner and servant. We conceptualize how these roles inform optimal ECA design and shape a two-stage value-by-proxy process, comprising proxy efficacy and outcome expectancy. Additionally, we uncover tensions within this process due to over-reliance on AI, as well as significant outcomes that extend beyond the immediate interaction. Our study, using a custom-developed ECA and a sample of 596 U.S.-based respondents, reveals that positioning an ECA in a partner role, combined with a human (vs. robot) appearance and emotional (vs. functional) conversation style, has the strongest positive impact on perceived value-by-proxy, usage and advice implementation intentions, and willingness to pay. We also observe an inverted U-shaped moderation by reliance in the relationship between proxy efficacy and outcome expectancy, signaling the potential risks of over-reliance on AI. Furthermore, we provide qualitative insights into why some customers avoid engaging with ECAs. Overall, we offer a nuanced perspective on ECAs as active stakeholders within organizational systems, advancing both theoretical understanding and practical applications of this rapidly evolving technology.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-04-24
Primary Topic
Biological and pharmacological studies of plants
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder engagement with AI service interactions

Figshare
Biological and pharmacological studies of plants
article

Stakeholder engagement with AI service interactions

article en

Abstract

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have ushered in a wave of AI innovations in the form of embodied conversational agents (ECAs). These stakeholders offer new ways to engage customers in the co-creation of services but still face significant customer skepticism. To address this challenge, we frame interactions between customers and ECAs through the lens of stakeholder engagement and apply the concept of proxy agency from social cognitive theory. This framework allows us to identify two primary stakeholder roles for ECAs: partner and servant. We conceptualize how these roles inform optimal ECA design and shape a two-stage value-by-proxy process, comprising proxy efficacy and outcome expectancy. Additionally, we uncover tensions within this process due to over-reliance on AI, as well as significant outcomes that extend beyond the immediate interaction. Our study, using a custom-developed ECA and a sample of 596 U.S.-based respondents, reveals that positioning an ECA in a partner role, combined with a human (vs. robot) appearance and emotional (vs. functional) conversation style, has the strongest positive impact on perceived value-by-proxy, usage and advice implementation intentions, and willingness to pay. We also observe an inverted U-shaped moderation by reliance in the relationship between proxy efficacy and outcome expectancy, signaling the potential risks of over-reliance on AI. Furthermore, we provide qualitative insights into why some customers avoid engaging with ECAs. Overall, we offer a nuanced perspective on ECAs as active stakeholders within organizational systems, advancing both theoretical understanding and practical applications of this rapidly evolving technology.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Biological and pharmacological studies of plants
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stakeholder engagement with AI service interactions · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS