Spatial Dynamics Shape the Interaction Between Motor Adaptation Processes

Motor adaptation relies on explicit aiming strategies and implicit recalibration, but their interaction and effects on implicit skill learning remain debated. While these processes were initially thought to combine linearly, recent research challenges this view, though spatial and temporal dynamics may have confounded these findings. Specifically, implicit recalibration peaks at where individuals aim their movements, and adaptation operates across multiple timescales, with both stable and volatile components. To examine whether these factors mask the true relationship between explicit strategies and implicit recalibration, we conducted a visuomotor rotation task that obtained independent measures of both processes while accounting for spatial and temporal dynamics. After controlling for task instruction clarity and spatial dynamics (plan-based generalization), we found a strong but subadditive relationship between explicit strategies and implicit recalibration, with temporal dynamics showing minimal influence. This sub-additivity may stem from methodological imprecision or nonlinear interactions between processes.

Publication Details

Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Dynamics Shape the Interaction Between Motor Adaptation Processes

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Spatial Dynamics Shape the Interaction Between Motor Adaptation Processes

article en

Abstract

Motor adaptation relies on explicit aiming strategies and implicit recalibration, but their interaction and effects on implicit skill learning remain debated. While these processes were initially thought to combine linearly, recent research challenges this view, though spatial and temporal dynamics may have confounded these findings. Specifically, implicit recalibration peaks at where individuals aim their movements, and adaptation operates across multiple timescales, with both stable and volatile components. To examine whether these factors mask the true relationship between explicit strategies and implicit recalibration, we conducted a visuomotor rotation task that obtained independent measures of both processes while accounting for spatial and temporal dynamics. After controlling for task instruction clarity and spatial dynamics (plan-based generalization), we found a strong but subadditive relationship between explicit strategies and implicit recalibration, with temporal dynamics showing minimal influence. This sub-additivity may stem from methodological imprecision or nonlinear interactions between processes.

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Princeton University, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.