Reply [to Burnout reflections: musings on Bianchi and Schonfeld’s five focal areas]

Contrary to what one might assume, the burnout construct did not emerge from systematic research. The definition of burnout was formulated in the 1970s based on prenotions and anecdotal evidence. No sound empirical studies, no in-depth theoretical reflections, not even a review of the stress literature underpinned the introduction of the construct. It is thus unsurprising that some observers regard the edifice of burnout research with scepticism. The pioneers of burnout research neglected basic scientific standards and, by overlooking the abundant work of contemporary stress researchers, deprived themselves of important safeguards against illusions of novelty making big claims based on weak evidence.

Publication Details

Journal
CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Amoebic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reply [to Burnout reflections: musings on Bianchi and Schonfeld’s five focal areas]

CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Amoebic Infections and Treatments
article

Reply [to Burnout reflections: musings on Bianchi and Schonfeld’s five focal areas]

article en

Abstract

Contrary to what one might assume, the burnout construct did not emerge from systematic research. The definition of burnout was formulated in the 1970s based on prenotions and anecdotal evidence. No sound empirical studies, no in-depth theoretical reflections, not even a review of the stress literature underpinned the introduction of the construct. It is thus unsurprising that some observers regard the edifice of burnout research with scepticism. The pioneers of burnout research neglected basic scientific standards and, by overlooking the abundant work of contemporary stress researchers, deprived themselves of important safeguards against illusions of novelty making big claims based on weak evidence.

CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Amoebic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reply [to Burnout reflections: musings on Bianchi and Schonfeld’s five focal areas] · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS