Self-Scheduled Category Learning in College Students

Learning new information can be a complex, gradual process. It is important to understand how learning plays out over time. Research has found that spaced schedules — studying new information in multiple sessions spread out over time — are more effective for learning than massed schedules — studying everything in one long session (Carvalho & Goldstone, 2013; Cepeda et al., 2006, Kornell & Bjork, 2008). However, when people schedule their own learning, they prefer massing (Kornell & Bjork, 2008; Tauber et al., 2013). Recent research suggests another type of schedule, clustering, might be more effective than both massing and spacing. Clustering involves spacing out clumps of massed studying (Slone et al., 2022; Yan et al., 2017). Little research has examined whether people choose to cluster when studying new information. The current study aims to fill this gap by examining how often people cluster their studying when learning new categories, and comparing the effectiveness to massing and spacing. Participants will see exemplars from nine categories (or "families") of alien creatures. Importantly, on each trial participants will choose which family to study next. We will examine which schedule (spaced, massed, or clustered) each participant implemented for learning each family. Participants will then be tested on their ability to correctly classify new creatures. We will examine which schedule(s) produce the best learning. We hypothesize that categories studied with clustered schedules will be learned best because clustering helps learners identify both similarities among family members (when viewed back-to-back as in massing) as well as differences between families (when switching categories as in spacing). Finally, participants will be asked to indicate their preferred learning schedule. We predict that the majority of participants will indicate that massing and clustering are equally effective. Our study has HSRB approval, and we are currently programming the experiment. We will begin collecting pilot data later in the semester.

Publication Details

Journal
Hope College Digital Commons (Hope College)
Published
2025-04-11
Primary Topic
Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Scheduled Category Learning in College Students

Hope College Digital Commons (Hope College)
Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
article

Self-Scheduled Category Learning in College Students

article en

Abstract

Learning new information can be a complex, gradual process. It is important to understand how learning plays out over time. Research has found that spaced schedules — studying new information in multiple sessions spread out over time — are more effective for learning than massed schedules — studying everything in one long session (Carvalho & Goldstone, 2013; Cepeda et al., 2006, Kornell & Bjork, 2008). However, when people schedule their own learning, they prefer massing (Kornell & Bjork, 2008; Tauber et al., 2013). Recent research suggests another type of schedule, clustering, might be more effective than both massing and spacing. Clustering involves spacing out clumps of massed studying (Slone et al., 2022; Yan et al., 2017). Little research has examined whether people choose to cluster when studying new information. The current study aims to fill this gap by examining how often people cluster their studying when learning new categories, and comparing the effectiveness to massing and spacing. Participants will see exemplars from nine categories (or "families") of alien creatures. Importantly, on each trial participants will choose which family to study next. We will examine which schedule (spaced, massed, or clustered) each participant implemented for learning each family. Participants will then be tested on their ability to correctly classify new creatures. We will examine which schedule(s) produce the best learning. We hypothesize that categories studied with clustered schedules will be learned best because clustering helps learners identify both similarities among family members (when viewed back-to-back as in massing) as well as differences between families (when switching categories as in spacing). Finally, participants will be asked to indicate their preferred learning schedule. We predict that the majority of participants will indicate that massing and clustering are equally effective. Our study has HSRB approval, and we are currently programming the experiment. We will begin collecting pilot data later in the semester.

Hope College Digital Commons (Hope College)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Self-Scheduled Category Learning in College Students · Hope College Digital Commons (Hope College) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS