ReCreate's Amicus Submission to the Constitutional Court in South Africa, May 2025

The Copyright Amendment Bill in South Africa aims to reform the copyright regime to provide additional rights to creators and users of copyrighted material. The main provisions for creators are a royalty right and increased control over commissioned works. For users, a series of exceptions and limitations are to be introduced.These include fair use for purposes such as education, personal use and research, as well as exceptions for libraries, archives and people with disabilities. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa referred the legislation to the Constitutional Court, primarily over concerns that the new rights for creators and users would constitute an “arbitrary deprivation of property” from rights holders (primarily publishers, broadcasters and other large corporations. ReCreate South Africa, a coalition of South African creators and users was admitted as amicus curiae to the court, to add its views on the legislation. In this document, ReCreate’s legal team sets out the key arguments, focused on the view that there can be no arbitrary deprivation of property where a law is being introduced to fulfill the rights of South Africans in a rational way through a law of general application. Abstract written by Ben Cashdan, convener of ReCreate.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-05-26
Primary Topic
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ReCreate's Amicus Submission to the Constitutional Court in South Africa, May 2025

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
article

ReCreate's Amicus Submission to the Constitutional Court in South Africa, May 2025

article en

Abstract

The Copyright Amendment Bill in South Africa aims to reform the copyright regime to provide additional rights to creators and users of copyrighted material. The main provisions for creators are a royalty right and increased control over commissioned works. For users, a series of exceptions and limitations are to be introduced.These include fair use for purposes such as education, personal use and research, as well as exceptions for libraries, archives and people with disabilities. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa referred the legislation to the Constitutional Court, primarily over concerns that the new rights for creators and users would constitute an “arbitrary deprivation of property” from rights holders (primarily publishers, broadcasters and other large corporations. ReCreate South Africa, a coalition of South African creators and users was admitted as amicus curiae to the court, to add its views on the legislation. In this document, ReCreate’s legal team sets out the key arguments, focused on the view that there can be no arbitrary deprivation of property where a law is being introduced to fulfill the rights of South Africans in a rational way through a law of general application. Abstract written by Ben Cashdan, convener of ReCreate.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ReCreate's Amicus Submission to the Constitutional Court in South Africa, May 2025 · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS