Preliminary Validation of a Complementary Food Frequency Questionnaire for Canadian Infants under One Year of Age

This study evaluated the validity and reproducibility of a Complementary Food Frequency Questionnaire (CFFQ) developed specifically for Canadian infants under one year of age, with the aim to assess the diverse nutrient intake of Canada's multicultural infants. Despite recruitment challenges, the study involved 15 parent-child pairs, with infants averaging 8.2 months old, and 60% of caregivers identifying as Latin American. Over a three-week period, participants completed two administrations of the CFFQ, and a 4-day weighed food record to assess dietary intake. Validity and reproducibility were measured over six statistical tests to assess agreement. Results showed poor validity for 89% of 18 nutrients. While total energy, protein, and fat displayed good reliability, inconsistencies were noted in cross-classification and Bland Altman measures. The CFFQ overestimates nutrient intake among Canadian infants and is not a valid dietary assessment tool. Nevertheless, this research provides preliminary insights for infant nutrition assessment practices in future studies.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholarship@Western (Western University)
Published
2024-10-16
Primary Topic
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preliminary Validation of a Complementary Food Frequency Questionnaire for Canadian Infants under One Year of Age

Scholarship@Western (Western University)
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
article

Preliminary Validation of a Complementary Food Frequency Questionnaire for Canadian Infants under One Year of Age

article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the validity and reproducibility of a Complementary Food Frequency Questionnaire (CFFQ) developed specifically for Canadian infants under one year of age, with the aim to assess the diverse nutrient intake of Canada's multicultural infants. Despite recruitment challenges, the study involved 15 parent-child pairs, with infants averaging 8.2 months old, and 60% of caregivers identifying as Latin American. Over a three-week period, participants completed two administrations of the CFFQ, and a 4-day weighed food record to assess dietary intake. Validity and reproducibility were measured over six statistical tests to assess agreement. Results showed poor validity for 89% of 18 nutrients. While total energy, protein, and fat displayed good reliability, inconsistencies were noted in cross-classification and Bland Altman measures. The CFFQ overestimates nutrient intake among Canadian infants and is not a valid dietary assessment tool. Nevertheless, this research provides preliminary insights for infant nutrition assessment practices in future studies.

Scholarship@Western (Western University)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.