The problem with Conceptual Mandelanisation

In this paper, I argue that selective homage is antithetical to the collectivist ethos that characterises African societies and constitutes a major problem in Mesembe Edet’s theory of ‘Conceptual Mandelanisation’ (CM). CM as an approach to system-building is built on reverence for the “deified personage” of Nelson Mandela. In search of a practical foundation for system-building in African philosophy, Edet proposed the theory of CM as a solution to the failures of system-building projects in postcolonial African philosophy. I shall first consider what is meant by CM in Edet’s philosophy. I then establish why CM as a theory promotes a system of selective homage due to its over-glorification of the sacrifices of one individual or leader over those of the community. I conclude my analysis by arguing that a consistent system-building project that aims to appropriate the personage of Africans would, in fact, appropriate the personages of the community or the collective personage of all its outstanding leaders, rather than that of a single individual.

Publication Details

Journal
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
African cultural and philosophical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The problem with Conceptual Mandelanisation

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
African cultural and philosophical studies
article

The problem with Conceptual Mandelanisation

article en

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that selective homage is antithetical to the collectivist ethos that characterises African societies and constitutes a major problem in Mesembe Edet’s theory of ‘Conceptual Mandelanisation’ (CM). CM as an approach to system-building is built on reverence for the “deified personage” of Nelson Mandela. In search of a practical foundation for system-building in African philosophy, Edet proposed the theory of CM as a solution to the failures of system-building projects in postcolonial African philosophy. I shall first consider what is meant by CM in Edet’s philosophy. I then establish why CM as a theory promotes a system of selective homage due to its over-glorification of the sacrifices of one individual or leader over those of the community. I conclude my analysis by arguing that a consistent system-building project that aims to appropriate the personage of Africans would, in fact, appropriate the personages of the community or the collective personage of all its outstanding leaders, rather than that of a single individual.

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
African cultural and philosophical studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.