Perpetrator induced distress: prevalence, event characteristics and outcomes in civilian samples

Limited research exists on the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of perpetration induced potentially traumatic events (PTEs) in the general population. In the present study, participants from two samples (N=735) described a distressing event that was caused by their own actions, and completed outcomes measuring perpetration induced distress (PID), anxiety, depression, existential concerns, and symptoms of PTSD and complex PTSD. 56.6% of participants identified a distressing event that they perceived to be caused by their own actions. Deductive coding categorized responses by 4 previously identified themes: physical harm (25.2%), interpersonal conflict/betrayal (52.4%), violation of internal standards (20.0%), and violation of external standards (17.8%). Additionally, the events were coded for involving acts of commission (80.5%) vs omission and for being intentional (69.5%) vs accidental. Results of t-tests suggest that those who experienced events that involved causing physical harm report higher scores across all outcome measures. Those with PTEs involving violation of external standards also reported higher PID and PTSD scores. No effects were found for other PTE characteristics. These findings support the relevance of PID in civilian populations and suggests that PTEs involving causing physical harm is an important predictor of distress across a variety of domains.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Mathematics Enthusiast
Published
2025-04-25
Primary Topic
Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perpetrator induced distress: prevalence, event characteristics and outcomes in civilian samples

The Mathematics Enthusiast
Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
article

Perpetrator induced distress: prevalence, event characteristics and outcomes in civilian samples

article en

Abstract

Limited research exists on the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of perpetration induced potentially traumatic events (PTEs) in the general population. In the present study, participants from two samples (N=735) described a distressing event that was caused by their own actions, and completed outcomes measuring perpetration induced distress (PID), anxiety, depression, existential concerns, and symptoms of PTSD and complex PTSD. 56.6% of participants identified a distressing event that they perceived to be caused by their own actions. Deductive coding categorized responses by 4 previously identified themes: physical harm (25.2%), interpersonal conflict/betrayal (52.4%), violation of internal standards (20.0%), and violation of external standards (17.8%). Additionally, the events were coded for involving acts of commission (80.5%) vs omission and for being intentional (69.5%) vs accidental. Results of t-tests suggest that those who experienced events that involved causing physical harm report higher scores across all outcome measures. Those with PTEs involving violation of external standards also reported higher PID and PTSD scores. No effects were found for other PTE characteristics. These findings support the relevance of PID in civilian populations and suggests that PTEs involving causing physical harm is an important predictor of distress across a variety of domains.

The Mathematics Enthusiast
University of Montana (US)
University of Montana
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.