Privileged Communications: A Case By Case Approach

Privileged communications are communications which, because of a special relationship, are protected from revelation during the course of litigation. In the past, grants of privilege have been made by reference to professional groups rather than to the content of the particular communication, resulting in inconsistent treatment. Some professionals have secured absolute privileges for their relationships while others have been partially or totally unsuccessful. The inconsistencies are most clearly demonstrated by examining grants of privilege to medical, psychotherapeutic, and social work personnel, although it is not intended that the case by case approach suggested in the proposed statute at the end of this note should be limited to these professions. The proposed statute suggests a procedure for dealing with claims of privilege in a more uniform way by shifting the emphasis away from the profession involved. The content of the communication and the effect of disclosure on the litigation involved and on the party who made the communication would determine the existence of a privilege on a case by case basis.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-05-07
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privileged Communications: A Case By Case Approach

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

Privileged Communications: A Case By Case Approach

article en

Abstract

Privileged communications are communications which, because of a special relationship, are protected from revelation during the course of litigation. In the past, grants of privilege have been made by reference to professional groups rather than to the content of the particular communication, resulting in inconsistent treatment. Some professionals have secured absolute privileges for their relationships while others have been partially or totally unsuccessful. The inconsistencies are most clearly demonstrated by examining grants of privilege to medical, psychotherapeutic, and social work personnel, although it is not intended that the case by case approach suggested in the proposed statute at the end of this note should be limited to these professions. The proposed statute suggests a procedure for dealing with claims of privilege in a more uniform way by shifting the emphasis away from the profession involved. The content of the communication and the effect of disclosure on the litigation involved and on the party who made the communication would determine the existence of a privilege on a case by case basis.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Privileged Communications: A Case By Case Approach · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS