The performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on genetic tests at PhD-level: GPT-4 as a promising tool for genomic medicine and education

Background: Natural Language Processing (NLP) has empowered AI models to understand and generate human language, with transformer-based architectures like GPT-3 and GPT-4 marking significant advancements. GPT-4, equipped with a larger parameter count and multimodal capabilities, offers enhanced accuracy and contextual understanding over its predecessor, GPT-3.5. However, challenges such as factual inaccuracies remain. This study aims to evaluate GPT-4’s performance on genetics-related tasks, assessing its strengths and limitations compared to GPT-3.5. Methods: We assessed GPT-4's performance across five key genetic tasks: (1) understanding basic genetic concepts, (2) interpreting family pedigrees, (3) analyzing genetic mutations, (4) solving population genetics problems, and (5) answering medical genetics Ph.D. entrance exam questions. Both open-ended and multiple-choice questions (MCQs) were used, some of which required forced justification to evaluate reasoning. GPT-4’s multimodal capabilities were also tested using pedigree images for inheritance pattern analysis. Results: GPT-4 demonstrated perfect accuracy in Task 1 (basic genetic concepts) and Task 3 (genetic mutation interpretation), correctly answering all 10 and 16 questions, respectively. In Task 2 (pedigree analysis), GPT-4 answered 24 out of 71 questions correctly, with 47 incorrect responses. For Task 4 (population genetics problems), GPT-4 provided 30 correct answers out of 34. In Task 5, which assessed performance on a Ph.D. entrance exam, GPT-4 correctly answered 58 out of 80 questions. Performance was notably higher for MCQs than for open-ended questions. Conclusion: GPT-4 substantially improves over GPT-3.5, particularly in understanding genetic concepts and interpreting genetic mutations. Despite these advances, its performance in more complex tasks, such as pedigree analysis, reveals areas that require further refinement. These findings highlight GPT-4's potential in advancing genetic education and research. Future studies should further explore GPT-4's capabilities and address its limitations in tasks that demand higher reasoning and factual accuracy.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on genetic tests at PhD-level: GPT-4 as a promising tool for genomic medicine and education

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

The performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on genetic tests at PhD-level: GPT-4 as a promising tool for genomic medicine and education

article en

Abstract

Background: Natural Language Processing (NLP) has empowered AI models to understand and generate human language, with transformer-based architectures like GPT-3 and GPT-4 marking significant advancements. GPT-4, equipped with a larger parameter count and multimodal capabilities, offers enhanced accuracy and contextual understanding over its predecessor, GPT-3.5. However, challenges such as factual inaccuracies remain. This study aims to evaluate GPT-4’s performance on genetics-related tasks, assessing its strengths and limitations compared to GPT-3.5. Methods: We assessed GPT-4's performance across five key genetic tasks: (1) understanding basic genetic concepts, (2) interpreting family pedigrees, (3) analyzing genetic mutations, (4) solving population genetics problems, and (5) answering medical genetics Ph.D. entrance exam questions. Both open-ended and multiple-choice questions (MCQs) were used, some of which required forced justification to evaluate reasoning. GPT-4’s multimodal capabilities were also tested using pedigree images for inheritance pattern analysis. Results: GPT-4 demonstrated perfect accuracy in Task 1 (basic genetic concepts) and Task 3 (genetic mutation interpretation), correctly answering all 10 and 16 questions, respectively. In Task 2 (pedigree analysis), GPT-4 answered 24 out of 71 questions correctly, with 47 incorrect responses. For Task 4 (population genetics problems), GPT-4 provided 30 correct answers out of 34. In Task 5, which assessed performance on a Ph.D. entrance exam, GPT-4 correctly answered 58 out of 80 questions. Performance was notably higher for MCQs than for open-ended questions. Conclusion: GPT-4 substantially improves over GPT-3.5, particularly in understanding genetic concepts and interpreting genetic mutations. Despite these advances, its performance in more complex tasks, such as pedigree analysis, reveals areas that require further refinement. These findings highlight GPT-4's potential in advancing genetic education and research. Future studies should further explore GPT-4's capabilities and address its limitations in tasks that demand higher reasoning and factual accuracy.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on genetic tests at PhD-level: GPT-4 as a promising tool for genomic medicine and education · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS