Patient Preference on Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment: A Systematic Review

Atsuko Kawasaki,1,* Miho Yuki,1,* Shizuka Nakagawa,1,* Keisuke Iwasaki,1,* Haruka Ochi,2,* Yasuo Sugitani1,* 1Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; 2Speciality Clinical Development Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Atsuko Kawasaki, Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 1‑1 Nihonbashi‑Muromachi 2‑Chome, Chuo‑ku, Tokyo, Japan, Email [email protected]: Patient preference is important in decision-making processes, such as drug approval and price determination. We conducted a systematic review regarding the preference of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treatment.Patients and Methods: We searched for articles on patient preferences for AMD treatment published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2023 using EMBASE, Google scholar, MEDLINE, and PLOS.Results: Seven studies were included in this systematic review. Conjoint analysis was used in all seven trials, of which six were Discrete Choice Experiments and one was a ranking. These studies were conducted in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Spain, and Singapore. Six studies focused on patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD, also called wet AMD, ie, wAMD), and one focused on patients with nAMD or diabetic macular edema. The attributes of the treatments used in these seven studies were efficacy, safety, convenience, and cost. Overall, the relative importance of attributes related to efficacy and safety were the highest, followed by those related to convenience and costs. The convenience and cost attributes were almost equal.Conclusion: Although the definitions of treatment attributes differed among the studies, patients with nAMD considered efficacy and safety to be the most important. The results of several studies suggest that patient preferences may be affected by patient demographics, such as sex. Although there are currently only a few preference studies on patients with AMD, it is necessary to continue conducting studies to understand the trends in patient preferences according to patient demographics.Keywords: patient preference, nAMD, systematic review, discrete choice experiment

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Biological and pharmacological studies of plants
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Preference on Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment: A Systematic Review

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Biological and pharmacological studies of plants
article

Patient Preference on Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment: A Systematic Review

article en

Abstract

Atsuko Kawasaki,1,* Miho Yuki,1,* Shizuka Nakagawa,1,* Keisuke Iwasaki,1,* Haruka Ochi,2,* Yasuo Sugitani1,* 1Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; 2Speciality Clinical Development Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Atsuko Kawasaki, Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 1‑1 Nihonbashi‑Muromachi 2‑Chome, Chuo‑ku, Tokyo, Japan, Email [email protected]: Patient preference is important in decision-making processes, such as drug approval and price determination. We conducted a systematic review regarding the preference of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treatment.Patients and Methods: We searched for articles on patient preferences for AMD treatment published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2023 using EMBASE, Google scholar, MEDLINE, and PLOS.Results: Seven studies were included in this systematic review. Conjoint analysis was used in all seven trials, of which six were Discrete Choice Experiments and one was a ranking. These studies were conducted in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Spain, and Singapore. Six studies focused on patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD, also called wet AMD, ie, wAMD), and one focused on patients with nAMD or diabetic macular edema. The attributes of the treatments used in these seven studies were efficacy, safety, convenience, and cost. Overall, the relative importance of attributes related to efficacy and safety were the highest, followed by those related to convenience and costs. The convenience and cost attributes were almost equal.Conclusion: Although the definitions of treatment attributes differed among the studies, patients with nAMD considered efficacy and safety to be the most important. The results of several studies suggest that patient preferences may be affected by patient demographics, such as sex. Although there are currently only a few preference studies on patients with AMD, it is necessary to continue conducting studies to understand the trends in patient preferences according to patient demographics.Keywords: patient preference, nAMD, systematic review, discrete choice experiment

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands) (NL), Amity University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Biological and pharmacological studies of plants
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.