Taxing Novelty

The advent of any new and unfamiliar economic activity sparks a flood of questions across a variety of legal fields, including tax law. This Article diagnoses the legal uncertainties surrounding novel activities as challenges of legibility in statecraft. Legibility is the process by which the state simplifies complex and often unfamiliar systems into a format that can be governed. Across broad areas of the law, placing things and activities into different legal categories is a means for the state to achieve legibility. This Article aims to incorporate the framework of legibility into existing scholarly discourse on legal categories. Through the case study of taxing cryptocurrency, this Article develops a descriptive account of how legal decision-makers render novel economic activities legible. This descriptive account uncovers ways in which achieving legibility can be challenging for these decision-makers and accompanying risks to legal systems, including the risks of legal arbitrage by powerful interest groups. The Article applies these insights to propose legal reforms specific to tax law. It advocates for tax law to move towards fewer tax categories, which can ease legibility challenges and reduce potential risks.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taxing Novelty

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Taxing Novelty

article en

Abstract

The advent of any new and unfamiliar economic activity sparks a flood of questions across a variety of legal fields, including tax law. This Article diagnoses the legal uncertainties surrounding novel activities as challenges of legibility in statecraft. Legibility is the process by which the state simplifies complex and often unfamiliar systems into a format that can be governed. Across broad areas of the law, placing things and activities into different legal categories is a means for the state to achieve legibility. This Article aims to incorporate the framework of legibility into existing scholarly discourse on legal categories. Through the case study of taxing cryptocurrency, this Article develops a descriptive account of how legal decision-makers render novel economic activities legible. This descriptive account uncovers ways in which achieving legibility can be challenging for these decision-makers and accompanying risks to legal systems, including the risks of legal arbitrage by powerful interest groups. The Article applies these insights to propose legal reforms specific to tax law. It advocates for tax law to move towards fewer tax categories, which can ease legibility challenges and reduce potential risks.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.