När doktrin möter förbandskultur : Doktrinimplementering på taktisk nivå

Military culture differs across nations and organizations, influencing how doctrines are implemented. This case study examined three Swedish Army units adopting a tactical doctrine, with varying results. Doctrines aim to transform organizations but often face resistance from established unit cultures. The study’s first question asked what defines a culture that supports doctrine implementation. Findings show that a cohesive, hierarchical unit culture balanced between combat and administration, with strong solidarity, best supports implementation. The second question focused on key factors for successful implementation. While Nissers’ (2021) model—emphasizing credibility and cultural fit—is necessary, the study identifies two additional factors: leadership and activities. Effective leadership involves role modeling, communication, and engagement, while activities like seminars and exercises are vital for putting doctrine into practice and measuring progress. The study also expands the concept of “cultural coherence,” suggesting that balanced, unified unit cultures are most likely to achieve successful tactical doctrine implementation.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Military History and Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

När doktrin möter förbandskultur : Doktrinimplementering på taktisk nivå

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Military History and Strategy
article

När doktrin möter förbandskultur : Doktrinimplementering på taktisk nivå

article en

Abstract

Military culture differs across nations and organizations, influencing how doctrines are implemented. This case study examined three Swedish Army units adopting a tactical doctrine, with varying results. Doctrines aim to transform organizations but often face resistance from established unit cultures. The study’s first question asked what defines a culture that supports doctrine implementation. Findings show that a cohesive, hierarchical unit culture balanced between combat and administration, with strong solidarity, best supports implementation. The second question focused on key factors for successful implementation. While Nissers’ (2021) model—emphasizing credibility and cultural fit—is necessary, the study identifies two additional factors: leadership and activities. Effective leadership involves role modeling, communication, and engagement, while activities like seminars and exercises are vital for putting doctrine into practice and measuring progress. The study also expands the concept of “cultural coherence,” suggesting that balanced, unified unit cultures are most likely to achieve successful tactical doctrine implementation.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Military History and Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

När doktrin möter förbandskultur : Doktrinimplementering på taktisk nivå · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS