Narrative Shift : How Business Media and Asset Managers Shape (and Escape) Social ESG

This thesis explores how business media and asset managers have communicated the socialdimension of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices between 2014 and 2024. Itfocuses on whether the narratives and their behaviours around social sustainability, have shifted,converged, or diverged over time. The study draws on Framing Theory, Agenda-Setting Theory,and Institutional Theory. And, through using qualitative content analysis, it examines how threemajor business media outlets and five of the world’s largest public asset managers have framedand prioritized key social ESG themes. A three-stage analytical framework guides the analysisby evaluating each actor’s behaviour, comparing the two cases and interpreting their actions inlight of institutional pressures. The findings suggest that business media have taken a moreactive role in shaping ESG discourse, while asset managers have primarily responded to externalexpectations, especially political and reputational risk. By examining how ESG language hasevolved, the study offers insights into how institutional and communicative dynamics may shapethe future of social sustainability.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narrative Shift : How Business Media and Asset Managers Shape (and Escape) Social ESG

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Narrative Shift : How Business Media and Asset Managers Shape (and Escape) Social ESG

article en

Abstract

This thesis explores how business media and asset managers have communicated the socialdimension of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices between 2014 and 2024. Itfocuses on whether the narratives and their behaviours around social sustainability, have shifted,converged, or diverged over time. The study draws on Framing Theory, Agenda-Setting Theory,and Institutional Theory. And, through using qualitative content analysis, it examines how threemajor business media outlets and five of the world’s largest public asset managers have framedand prioritized key social ESG themes. A three-stage analytical framework guides the analysisby evaluating each actor’s behaviour, comparing the two cases and interpreting their actions inlight of institutional pressures. The findings suggest that business media have taken a moreactive role in shaping ESG discourse, while asset managers have primarily responded to externalexpectations, especially political and reputational risk. By examining how ESG language hasevolved, the study offers insights into how institutional and communicative dynamics may shapethe future of social sustainability.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Uppsala University (SE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Narrative Shift : How Business Media and Asset Managers Shape (and Escape) Social ESG · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS