A Meta-analysis of Age-related effect on Loss Aversion

Prospect Theoretic Loss aversion (λ) suggests we overvalue losses compared to gains during decision making but the influence of age on loss aversion is unclear. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis on 7 studies that measured loss aversion and the age of participants. The pooled estimate (β=0.0886, 95%CI [0.0087 0.1686] revealed an effect of age on loss aversion. Considering age as continuous (n=1103, 5 studies; β = -0.005233, t= -2.511, p = 0.0122) or categorical (n=1856, 8 studies; β=0.00856, t= 0.111, p = 0.912) reflected substantial differences. Dividing participants broadly (< 46 and > 45 years) to explore differences in estimates of loss aversion (λ>1, λ =1, λ<1), also found significant differences, X2 (2, 1856)=7.5362, p = 0.0231. These findings underscore the veracity of meta-analysis for advancing and explicating previously underexplored aspects of decision theory.

Publication Details

Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Meta-analysis of Age-related effect on Loss Aversion

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

A Meta-analysis of Age-related effect on Loss Aversion

article en

Abstract

Prospect Theoretic Loss aversion (λ) suggests we overvalue losses compared to gains during decision making but the influence of age on loss aversion is unclear. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis on 7 studies that measured loss aversion and the age of participants. The pooled estimate (β=0.0886, 95%CI [0.0087 0.1686] revealed an effect of age on loss aversion. Considering age as continuous (n=1103, 5 studies; β = -0.005233, t= -2.511, p = 0.0122) or categorical (n=1856, 8 studies; β=0.00856, t= 0.111, p = 0.912) reflected substantial differences. Dividing participants broadly (< 46 and > 45 years) to explore differences in estimates of loss aversion (λ>1, λ =1, λ<1), also found significant differences, X2 (2, 1856)=7.5362, p = 0.0231. These findings underscore the veracity of meta-analysis for advancing and explicating previously underexplored aspects of decision theory.

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Meta-analysis of Age-related effect on Loss Aversion · eScholarship (California Digital Library) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS