Meal Glucose Tolerance Test (MGTT): A Validation Study

Continuous Glucose Monitoring devices (CGMs) allow for a dynamic assessment of postprandial glycemic variability (GV). Using a CGM device, such as the Freestyle Libre Pro, researchers can monitor research participants blood glucose levels continuously for up to 14 days in a free-living environment. Because of this, researchers have begun to rely on CGMs as a tool to understand chronic changes in glycemic responses. PURPOSE: For this research study, we are investigating the viability of using a CGM and standard meal test (MGTT) to assess the glycemic response against a standard Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT). METHODS: On two separate days after fasting for 10 hours, each participant was randomized to receive either a standard meal test (MGTT) or 75g glucose beverage (OGTT). During the 2hr postprandial period, simultaneous glucose measurements were taken via CGM and blood measurements every 15 minutes (9 measurements each). The area under the curve (AUC), peak glucose (PG), and time to peak (PG) for each treatment and testing method will be analyzed. RESULTS: A Preliminary assessment showed that the mean values between CGM and blood measurements were significantly different for both standard test meal and drink conditions (p Another preliminary assessment showed that the mean values of the meal test and glucose drink were not different between CGM (p=0.83) and blood (p=0.18) testing measurements. CONCLUSION: This research is ongoing, and the results presented are preliminary. However, the data does suggest that using a CGM in conjunction with a MGTT may be a reliable method for evaluating standardized glycemic response in a free-living conditions.

Publication Details

Journal
TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Published
2024-11-06
Primary Topic
International Law and Aviation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meal Glucose Tolerance Test (MGTT): A Validation Study

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
International Law and Aviation
article

Meal Glucose Tolerance Test (MGTT): A Validation Study

article en

Abstract

Continuous Glucose Monitoring devices (CGMs) allow for a dynamic assessment of postprandial glycemic variability (GV). Using a CGM device, such as the Freestyle Libre Pro, researchers can monitor research participants blood glucose levels continuously for up to 14 days in a free-living environment. Because of this, researchers have begun to rely on CGMs as a tool to understand chronic changes in glycemic responses. PURPOSE: For this research study, we are investigating the viability of using a CGM and standard meal test (MGTT) to assess the glycemic response against a standard Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT). METHODS: On two separate days after fasting for 10 hours, each participant was randomized to receive either a standard meal test (MGTT) or 75g glucose beverage (OGTT). During the 2hr postprandial period, simultaneous glucose measurements were taken via CGM and blood measurements every 15 minutes (9 measurements each). The area under the curve (AUC), peak glucose (PG), and time to peak (PG) for each treatment and testing method will be analyzed. RESULTS: A Preliminary assessment showed that the mean values between CGM and blood measurements were significantly different for both standard test meal and drink conditions (p Another preliminary assessment showed that the mean values of the meal test and glucose drink were not different between CGM (p=0.83) and blood (p=0.18) testing measurements. CONCLUSION: This research is ongoing, and the results presented are preliminary. However, the data does suggest that using a CGM in conjunction with a MGTT may be a reliable method for evaluating standardized glycemic response in a free-living conditions.

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
International Law and Aviation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.