Leveraging generative AI for enhancing university-level English writing : comparative insights on automated feedback and student engagement

This study explores the impact of generative AI-based feedback, specifically utilizing ChatGPT, on the essay-writing proficiency and revision outcomes of university students in Hong Kong. A randomized controlled trial was conducted, where one group received AI-generated feedback while the control group received traditional feedback. The study investigates both the quantitative improvements in essay revisions and the qualitative aspects of student engagement, motivation, and emotional response to AI feedback. Results indicate that students who received AI feedback demonstrated statistically significant improvements in their writing quality and reported higher levels of motivation and engagement during the revision process. Additionally, thematic analysis from student interviews revealed mixed emotional responses, though many participants highlighted the usefulness of the AI in providing targeted, actionable feedback. This research contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the integration of AI tools in higher education for enhancing student learning outcomes and reducing instructor workload.

Publication Details

Journal
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Published
2025-12-31
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging generative AI for enhancing university-level English writing : comparative insights on automated feedback and student engagement

Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
article

Leveraging generative AI for enhancing university-level English writing : comparative insights on automated feedback and student engagement

article en

Abstract

This study explores the impact of generative AI-based feedback, specifically utilizing ChatGPT, on the essay-writing proficiency and revision outcomes of university students in Hong Kong. A randomized controlled trial was conducted, where one group received AI-generated feedback while the control group received traditional feedback. The study investigates both the quantitative improvements in essay revisions and the qualitative aspects of student engagement, motivation, and emotional response to AI feedback. Results indicate that students who received AI feedback demonstrated statistically significant improvements in their writing quality and reported higher levels of motivation and engagement during the revision process. Additionally, thematic analysis from student interviews revealed mixed emotional responses, though many participants highlighted the usefulness of the AI in providing targeted, actionable feedback. This research contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the integration of AI tools in higher education for enhancing student learning outcomes and reducing instructor workload.

Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.