La validez de la prueba electrónica en procesos no penales y la seguridad jurídica

Technological advancements have influenced procedural law, as electronic evidence may contain information relevant to legal disputes. This has led various jurisdictions, including Ecuador, to recognize and regulate this type of evidence. However, there are differences between criminal and civil law regarding the codification of electronic evidence. Civil law takes into account certain general aspects for its presentation in civil and non-criminal proceedings, whereas in the criminal domain, specific technical criteria must be met to ensure its validity.These characteristics are significant, as in practice, they imply that both justice operators and procedural subjects may have technical difficulties when incorporating and presenting electronic evidence. Therefore, the aim of this article is to analyze whether the normative regulation in non-criminal proceedings is comprehensive and allows for clear and prior rules that guarantee elements of the right to legal certainty.In such a way that the authors have made a systematic verification of bibliography related to the subject, to know doctrinal criteria and analyze the existing norms. With which it is concluded that there is a normative vacuum around the practice of electronic evidence in non-criminal processes that threatens legal certainty in Ecuador.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Legal processes and jurisprudence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

La validez de la prueba electrónica en procesos no penales y la seguridad jurídica

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Legal processes and jurisprudence
article

La validez de la prueba electrónica en procesos no penales y la seguridad jurídica

article en

Abstract

Technological advancements have influenced procedural law, as electronic evidence may contain information relevant to legal disputes. This has led various jurisdictions, including Ecuador, to recognize and regulate this type of evidence. However, there are differences between criminal and civil law regarding the codification of electronic evidence. Civil law takes into account certain general aspects for its presentation in civil and non-criminal proceedings, whereas in the criminal domain, specific technical criteria must be met to ensure its validity.These characteristics are significant, as in practice, they imply that both justice operators and procedural subjects may have technical difficulties when incorporating and presenting electronic evidence. Therefore, the aim of this article is to analyze whether the normative regulation in non-criminal proceedings is comprehensive and allows for clear and prior rules that guarantee elements of the right to legal certainty.In such a way that the authors have made a systematic verification of bibliography related to the subject, to know doctrinal criteria and analyze the existing norms. With which it is concluded that there is a normative vacuum around the practice of electronic evidence in non-criminal processes that threatens legal certainty in Ecuador.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Universidad Autónoma de Centro América (CR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Legal processes and jurisprudence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

La validez de la prueba electrónica en procesos no penales y la seguridad jurídica · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS