La polarización política en España: ¿Realidad o ficción? Evidencias empíricas a través del análisis de los discursos parlamentarios en el estado de alarma

The research examines the degree of polarization in political discourse during the COVID-19 health emergency in Spain. It analyzes the political speeches of leaders from the main national parties represented in the Spanish Congress of Deputies (PSOE, PP, Vox, UP, and Cs) as well as those of the Prime Minister, focusing on the parliamentary sessions where the government’s communications accompanying Royal Decree 463/2020, declaring the state of emergency, and its six extensions, were debated and voted upon. A quantitative and qualitative content analysis is conducted, along with a regression analysis to investigate the determinants of polarization levels in these discourses. The findings reveal a progressive increase in debate tension, diverging from the initial unity, and show that leaders ideologically positioned on the right exhibit higher levels of polarization in their speeches.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
e-rph (University of Granada)
Published
2024-12-30
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

La polarización política en España: ¿Realidad o ficción? Evidencias empíricas a través del análisis de los discursos parlamentarios en el estado de alarma

e-rph (University of Granada)
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

La polarización política en España: ¿Realidad o ficción? Evidencias empíricas a través del análisis de los discursos parlamentarios en el estado de alarma

article en

Abstract

The research examines the degree of polarization in political discourse during the COVID-19 health emergency in Spain. It analyzes the political speeches of leaders from the main national parties represented in the Spanish Congress of Deputies (PSOE, PP, Vox, UP, and Cs) as well as those of the Prime Minister, focusing on the parliamentary sessions where the government’s communications accompanying Royal Decree 463/2020, declaring the state of emergency, and its six extensions, were debated and voted upon. A quantitative and qualitative content analysis is conducted, along with a regression analysis to investigate the determinants of polarization levels in these discourses. The findings reveal a progressive increase in debate tension, diverging from the initial unity, and show that leaders ideologically positioned on the right exhibit higher levels of polarization in their speeches.

e-rph (University of Granada)
Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.