Il lento cammino di affermazione del dialogo tra UE, chiese e organizzazioni filosofiche e non confessionali. Un’occasione mancata di valorizzazione?

Article 17 of the TFEU, and in particular its third paragraph, represents the point of synthesis of a European pathway in which the institutions have intended to weave a network of dialogue with social representations on the religious, philosophical and non-confessional front. This space of confrontation has as its prerequisite the recognition of the identity and specific contribution of which the actors themselves are spokesmen, holding all the potential to become a privileged tool for offering keys to interpret new emerging issues, from the environment to AI to humanitarian and war crises. However, the legacies of the past, in which territorial religions have enjoyed a margin of intervention, risk nullifying and rendering futile the indispensable contribution that the representatives of the interests referred to can offer to current issues, each with his or her own heritage and cultural background.

Publication Details

Journal
CINECA IRIS Institutional Research information system (University of Urbino)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Il lento cammino di affermazione del dialogo tra UE, chiese e organizzazioni filosofiche e non confessionali. Un’occasione mancata di valorizzazione?

CINECA IRIS Institutional Research information system (University of Urbino)
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Il lento cammino di affermazione del dialogo tra UE, chiese e organizzazioni filosofiche e non confessionali. Un’occasione mancata di valorizzazione?

article en

Abstract

Article 17 of the TFEU, and in particular its third paragraph, represents the point of synthesis of a European pathway in which the institutions have intended to weave a network of dialogue with social representations on the religious, philosophical and non-confessional front. This space of confrontation has as its prerequisite the recognition of the identity and specific contribution of which the actors themselves are spokesmen, holding all the potential to become a privileged tool for offering keys to interpret new emerging issues, from the environment to AI to humanitarian and war crises. However, the legacies of the past, in which territorial religions have enjoyed a margin of intervention, risk nullifying and rendering futile the indispensable contribution that the representatives of the interests referred to can offer to current issues, each with his or her own heritage and cultural background.

CINECA IRIS Institutional Research information system (University of Urbino)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.