The Impact of Anatomic Racial Variations on Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Filipino Retinal Fundus Photographs Using an Image-Based Deep Learning Model

Objectives: This study evaluated the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) model in identifying retinal lesions, validated its performance on a Filipino population dataset, and evaluated the impact of dataset diversity on AI analysis accuracy. Methods: This cross-sectional, analytical, institutional study analyzed standardized macula-centered fundus photos taken with the Zeiss Visucam®. The AI model's output was compared with manual readings by trained retina specialists. Results: A total of 215 eyes from 109 patients were included in the study. Human graders identified 109 eyes (50.7%) with retinal abnormalities. The AI model demonstrated an overall accuracy of 73.0% (95% CI 66.6% – 78.8%) in detecting abnormal retinas, with a sensitivity of 54.1% (95% CI 44.3% – 63.7%) and specificity of 92.5% (95% CI 85.7% – 96.7%). Conclusions: The availability and sources of AI training datasets can introduce biases into AI algorithms. In our dataset, racial differences in retinal morphology, such as differences in retinal pigmentation, affected the accuracy of AI image-based analysis. More diverse datasets and external validation on different populations are needed to mitigate these biases.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Anatomic Racial Variations on Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Filipino Retinal Fundus Photographs Using an Image-Based Deep Learning Model

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

The Impact of Anatomic Racial Variations on Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Filipino Retinal Fundus Photographs Using an Image-Based Deep Learning Model

article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) model in identifying retinal lesions, validated its performance on a Filipino population dataset, and evaluated the impact of dataset diversity on AI analysis accuracy. Methods: This cross-sectional, analytical, institutional study analyzed standardized macula-centered fundus photos taken with the Zeiss Visucam®. The AI model's output was compared with manual readings by trained retina specialists. Results: A total of 215 eyes from 109 patients were included in the study. Human graders identified 109 eyes (50.7%) with retinal abnormalities. The AI model demonstrated an overall accuracy of 73.0% (95% CI 66.6% – 78.8%) in detecting abnormal retinas, with a sensitivity of 54.1% (95% CI 44.3% – 63.7%) and specificity of 92.5% (95% CI 85.7% – 96.7%). Conclusions: The availability and sources of AI training datasets can introduce biases into AI algorithms. In our dataset, racial differences in retinal morphology, such as differences in retinal pigmentation, affected the accuracy of AI image-based analysis. More diverse datasets and external validation on different populations are needed to mitigate these biases.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.