How many cells should be counted when performing a differential count on bovine non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage fluid?

Objectives: Noninfectious airway inflammation, for example, due to high levels of particulate matter, can predispose to airway infection. The most accessible method to assess airway inflammation in living animals is cytologic analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. However, this is a labor-intensive method due to the high number of cells ideally included in the differential count. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if counting 300 cells would yield comparable results compared to 500 cells. Materials and methods: Differential counts based on 300 and 500 cells were performed on 134 Hemacolor stained, cytospin preparations. Bland-Altman plots and calculation of beta gamma tolerance intervals were performed. For lymphocytes, bootstrapping was implemented to account for the non-normal distribution. The maximal acceptable difference was set at 5% for macrophages and neutrophils, and 2.5% for lymphocytes. Results: By the calculation of beta gamma tolerance interval it was predicted with 90% certainty that 95% of future results would lie in the interval of -3.99% to 3.76% for macrophages, -3.39% to 3.74% for neutrophils, -1.78% to 1.62% for lymphocytes. Tolerance intervals were not calculated for eosinophils due to their distribution and a slight proportional bias. The maximum observed difference was 1.13%. Conclusions: For diagnostic purposes, macrophages, neutrophils and lymphocytes enumeration based on 300 cells seems a reliable and less time-consuming alternative in comparison to the 500 cell differential count.

Publication Details

Journal
Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How many cells should be counted when performing a differential count on bovine non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage fluid?

Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

How many cells should be counted when performing a differential count on bovine non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage fluid?

article en

Abstract

Objectives: Noninfectious airway inflammation, for example, due to high levels of particulate matter, can predispose to airway infection. The most accessible method to assess airway inflammation in living animals is cytologic analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. However, this is a labor-intensive method due to the high number of cells ideally included in the differential count. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if counting 300 cells would yield comparable results compared to 500 cells. Materials and methods: Differential counts based on 300 and 500 cells were performed on 134 Hemacolor stained, cytospin preparations. Bland-Altman plots and calculation of beta gamma tolerance intervals were performed. For lymphocytes, bootstrapping was implemented to account for the non-normal distribution. The maximal acceptable difference was set at 5% for macrophages and neutrophils, and 2.5% for lymphocytes. Results: By the calculation of beta gamma tolerance interval it was predicted with 90% certainty that 95% of future results would lie in the interval of -3.99% to 3.76% for macrophages, -3.39% to 3.74% for neutrophils, -1.78% to 1.62% for lymphocytes. Tolerance intervals were not calculated for eosinophils due to their distribution and a slight proportional bias. The maximum observed difference was 1.13%. Conclusions: For diagnostic purposes, macrophages, neutrophils and lymphocytes enumeration based on 300 cells seems a reliable and less time-consuming alternative in comparison to the 500 cell differential count.

Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.