Global Civil Society: The Rise of a New Global Actor?

The aim of this article is to provide some reflective views on the political origins of the epistemological process leading to the ontological notion of Global Civil Society (GCS). From this perspective, the GCS is depicted as a social construction inherent to the dynamics of globalization. It has become a social referent derived from biased cognitive perceptions acquired through, and based upon, information gathering from the media and other processed data sources. As a theoretical concept, GCS has been strategically adapted to the political objective of managing the growingly diversified expressions of knowledge awareness about transnationalized societal environment. The role of epistemic and other innovation communities, such as think tanks and discourse coalitions, is addressed and evaluated. From an international relations theoretical perspective, arguments are provided on why the GCS cannot be considered as a global actor. The article also addresses how and why the GCS tends to be politically and socially equated with resistance and/or anti-globalization movements, stressing some of the multidimensional effects stemming from this conceptual linkage and derived causality nexus. The vague and loose definition of GCS, and the constantly evolving societal contours of the notion, allow for the fuzziness of its conceptual meanng, operational milieu and analytical margins, as well as for the multiple, flexible, simultaneously transitory and diversified allegiances, including tactically space-time oriented in-and-out movements, thus providing for the strategically instrumental function ascribed to this “problem-solving” concept.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Published
2024-11-20
Primary Topic
Globalization and political ideologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Civil Society: The Rise of a New Global Actor?

Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Globalization and political ideologies
article

Global Civil Society: The Rise of a New Global Actor?

article en

Abstract

The aim of this article is to provide some reflective views on the political origins of the epistemological process leading to the ontological notion of Global Civil Society (GCS). From this perspective, the GCS is depicted as a social construction inherent to the dynamics of globalization. It has become a social referent derived from biased cognitive perceptions acquired through, and based upon, information gathering from the media and other processed data sources. As a theoretical concept, GCS has been strategically adapted to the political objective of managing the growingly diversified expressions of knowledge awareness about transnationalized societal environment. The role of epistemic and other innovation communities, such as think tanks and discourse coalitions, is addressed and evaluated. From an international relations theoretical perspective, arguments are provided on why the GCS cannot be considered as a global actor. The article also addresses how and why the GCS tends to be politically and socially equated with resistance and/or anti-globalization movements, stressing some of the multidimensional effects stemming from this conceptual linkage and derived causality nexus. The vague and loose definition of GCS, and the constantly evolving societal contours of the notion, allow for the fuzziness of its conceptual meanng, operational milieu and analytical margins, as well as for the multiple, flexible, simultaneously transitory and diversified allegiances, including tactically space-time oriented in-and-out movements, thus providing for the strategically instrumental function ascribed to this “problem-solving” concept.

Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências (PT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Globalization and political ideologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.