Gender-Based Differences in Olympic Lift Velocity and Reactive Jump Metrics: Longitudinal Data from Collegiate Jumpers

Strength and conditioning professionals routinely collect performance data from velocity- and power-based assessments. However, turning that data into longitudinal insights remains a challenge. This study presents a practical example of how training data can be leveraged to support data-informed programming decisions. PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between Olympic lift performance and unilateral depth jump performance in collegiate jumpers, and whether this relationship differs by gender. METHODS: Thirteen NCAA Division I track and field athletes (n = 7 women; n = 6 men) from long, triple, and high jump events participated. Athletes completed repeated testing over a 14-month period, including Olympic lifts (Power Clean, Hang Clean, and Barbell Snatch) and unilateral depth jumps (12 in. for women, 18 in. for men) using a force plate system (Hawkin Dynamics, USA). Barbell velocity (m/s) was collected from Power Clean, Hang Clean, and Snatch. Five metrics were collected from each depth jump: Jump Height, Reactive Strength Index (RSI), Braking Phase, Contact Time, and Peak Propulsive Power. Linear regressions were performed for each jump metric using each lift as a predictor in MATLAB. Subgroup analyses were conducted by gender. RESULTS: In the full sample, Hang Clean significantly predicted RSI, R² = .20, F(1, 34) = 8.08, p = .007; and Power Clean predicted Peak Propulsive Power, R² = .19, F(1, 35) = 8.14, p = .007. Among women, stronger relationships emerged, including RSI predicted by Power Clean, R² = .33, F(1, 16) = 7.96, p = .012. Results were weaker and non-significant in men. Snatch models were limited by sample size. CONCLUSION: Olympic lift velocity, especially Power and Hang Clean, is associated with reactive jump performance in women jumpers. These findings support using longitudinal testing to monitor adaptation, guide athlete-specific training decisions, and highlight the potential benefit of gender-specific profiling when targeting explosive qualities in collegiate jumpers. Coaches may consider integrating regular lift velocity tracking as a proxy for jump performance potential, particularly in women athletes. This approach demonstrates how routine weight-room data can be leveraged to evaluate explosive characteristics without requiring additional field testing.

Publication Details

Journal
TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Published
2025-05-07
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender-Based Differences in Olympic Lift Velocity and Reactive Jump Metrics: Longitudinal Data from Collegiate Jumpers

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Sports Performance and Training
article

Gender-Based Differences in Olympic Lift Velocity and Reactive Jump Metrics: Longitudinal Data from Collegiate Jumpers

article en

Abstract

Strength and conditioning professionals routinely collect performance data from velocity- and power-based assessments. However, turning that data into longitudinal insights remains a challenge. This study presents a practical example of how training data can be leveraged to support data-informed programming decisions. PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between Olympic lift performance and unilateral depth jump performance in collegiate jumpers, and whether this relationship differs by gender. METHODS: Thirteen NCAA Division I track and field athletes (n = 7 women; n = 6 men) from long, triple, and high jump events participated. Athletes completed repeated testing over a 14-month period, including Olympic lifts (Power Clean, Hang Clean, and Barbell Snatch) and unilateral depth jumps (12 in. for women, 18 in. for men) using a force plate system (Hawkin Dynamics, USA). Barbell velocity (m/s) was collected from Power Clean, Hang Clean, and Snatch. Five metrics were collected from each depth jump: Jump Height, Reactive Strength Index (RSI), Braking Phase, Contact Time, and Peak Propulsive Power. Linear regressions were performed for each jump metric using each lift as a predictor in MATLAB. Subgroup analyses were conducted by gender. RESULTS: In the full sample, Hang Clean significantly predicted RSI, R² = .20, F(1, 34) = 8.08, p = .007; and Power Clean predicted Peak Propulsive Power, R² = .19, F(1, 35) = 8.14, p = .007. Among women, stronger relationships emerged, including RSI predicted by Power Clean, R² = .33, F(1, 16) = 7.96, p = .012. Results were weaker and non-significant in men. Snatch models were limited by sample size. CONCLUSION: Olympic lift velocity, especially Power and Hang Clean, is associated with reactive jump performance in women jumpers. These findings support using longitudinal testing to monitor adaptation, guide athlete-specific training decisions, and highlight the potential benefit of gender-specific profiling when targeting explosive qualities in collegiate jumpers. Coaches may consider integrating regular lift velocity tracking as a proxy for jump performance potential, particularly in women athletes. This approach demonstrates how routine weight-room data can be leveraged to evaluate explosive characteristics without requiring additional field testing.

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gender-Based Differences in Olympic Lift Velocity and Reactive Jump Metrics: Longitudinal Data from Collegiate Jumpers · TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS