Framing sustainability in CEOs’ letters. Informativity vs. accessibility

In recent years, the aviation industry has transformed its approach to carbon emissions disclosures due to public scrutiny and regulatory pressures. This study analyzes letters from CEOs of selected airlines in 2019 and 2021, employing appraisal theory to explore shifts in messaging strategies. The analysis reveals that while 2019 communications emphasized economic considerations, by 2021, a more ethical approach emerged, with increased use of terms like “sustainability”, “concern”, and “regulation”. This shift reflects a growing awareness of moral responsibility regarding environmental impact. However, the focus on ethical language raises questions about clarity and accessibility for stakeholders. Organizations must prioritize transparent, relevant communication to build trust, as vague language can foster skepticism about corporate commitments, highlighting the need for balanced, objective reporting in sustainability efforts.

Publication Details

Journal
IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing sustainability in CEOs’ letters. Informativity vs. accessibility

IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia)
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Framing sustainability in CEOs’ letters. Informativity vs. accessibility

article en

Abstract

In recent years, the aviation industry has transformed its approach to carbon emissions disclosures due to public scrutiny and regulatory pressures. This study analyzes letters from CEOs of selected airlines in 2019 and 2021, employing appraisal theory to explore shifts in messaging strategies. The analysis reveals that while 2019 communications emphasized economic considerations, by 2021, a more ethical approach emerged, with increased use of terms like “sustainability”, “concern”, and “regulation”. This shift reflects a growing awareness of moral responsibility regarding environmental impact. However, the focus on ethical language raises questions about clarity and accessibility for stakeholders. Organizations must prioritize transparent, relevant communication to build trust, as vague language can foster skepticism about corporate commitments, highlighting the need for balanced, objective reporting in sustainability efforts.

IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.