Eye of the Storm : The effects of foreign humanitarian aid on conflict intensity following a natural disaster

This study examines the relationship between foreign humanitarian aid and the intensity of intrastate armed conflict following natural disasters, focusing on two case studies: Typhoon Durian (2006) and Typhoon Washi (2011) in the Philippines. The analysis is framed by a theoretical argument proposing that foreign aid from democratic actors post-disaster de-escalates conflict by restricting rebel opportunities, although increasing grievances. The findings indicate no conclusive evidence that foreign aid significantly reduced conflict intensity in either case, primarily due to methodological limitations and confounding variables. Nonetheless, the research highlights the potential for future studies to refine methods and explore the nuanced impacts of aid on conflict dynamics. Lastly, the study underscores the complexity of the aid-conflict nexus and the need for improved methods in research to help policymakers in optimizing humanitarian interventions.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eye of the Storm : The effects of foreign humanitarian aid on conflict intensity following a natural disaster

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Eye of the Storm : The effects of foreign humanitarian aid on conflict intensity following a natural disaster

article en

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between foreign humanitarian aid and the intensity of intrastate armed conflict following natural disasters, focusing on two case studies: Typhoon Durian (2006) and Typhoon Washi (2011) in the Philippines. The analysis is framed by a theoretical argument proposing that foreign aid from democratic actors post-disaster de-escalates conflict by restricting rebel opportunities, although increasing grievances. The findings indicate no conclusive evidence that foreign aid significantly reduced conflict intensity in either case, primarily due to methodological limitations and confounding variables. Nonetheless, the research highlights the potential for future studies to refine methods and explore the nuanced impacts of aid on conflict dynamics. Lastly, the study underscores the complexity of the aid-conflict nexus and the need for improved methods in research to help policymakers in optimizing humanitarian interventions.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.