Evaluation of Stereotypical Biases in Recent GPT Models

State-of-the-art GPT models are being increasingly used in different domains. However, previous research has discovered stereotypical biases in their outputs. To address this, we proposes a two-phase approach. During Phase I, we use benchmark datasets to identify bias. Based on the literature, we define three metrics that consider both the preference toward stereotypes and the ability of models to refuse providing an answer when prompted with biased content. In Phase II, we examine the stability of the results from Phase I by an adversarial attack. We apply our approach to GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 using the BBQ and CrowS-Pairs benchmark datasets. The evaluation shows that both models are biased toward stereotypes with GPT-4 refusing to answer more often. However, if it does so, the results are more biased. Additionally, the adversarial attack could induce the models to provide an answer, but that did not impact the level of bias substantially.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Stereotypical Biases in Recent GPT Models

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Evaluation of Stereotypical Biases in Recent GPT Models

article en

Abstract

State-of-the-art GPT models are being increasingly used in different domains. However, previous research has discovered stereotypical biases in their outputs. To address this, we proposes a two-phase approach. During Phase I, we use benchmark datasets to identify bias. Based on the literature, we define three metrics that consider both the preference toward stereotypes and the ability of models to refuse providing an answer when prompted with biased content. In Phase II, we examine the stability of the results from Phase I by an adversarial attack. We apply our approach to GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 using the BBQ and CrowS-Pairs benchmark datasets. The evaluation shows that both models are biased toward stereotypes with GPT-4 refusing to answer more often. However, if it does so, the results are more biased. Additionally, the adversarial attack could induce the models to provide an answer, but that did not impact the level of bias substantially.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.