Eski fitir-la touzour insertin? Is the future still uncertain?: The acceptability of Mauritian Creole’s elusive VA marker in future contexts

Abstract Most research regarding Mauritian Creole future marking was carried out in the 1990s and assumed differences in ‘certainty’ dictated the choice of future marker ( Baker 1993 ; Hazaël-Massieux 1993 ; Touchard & Véronique 1993 ). The consensus was that the two main markers, POU and VA , were used for ‘definite’ and ‘indefinite’ future events respectively. However, this distinction was inadequately defined, and although intuitively solid, it could not account for many naturally occurring instances. Davidson (2021) quantified a range of features relevant for future expression and a new obligation meaning of VA was mentioned by some speakers. In this paper, we explore in more detail the POU/VA opposition, considering contexts with different nuances of obligation/necessity and their compatibility with VA . Overall, VA is more acceptable in contexts which can be interpreted as obligation/necessity and it is now not only restricted to indefinite or ‘less certain’ contexts.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eski fitir-la touzour insertin? Is the future still uncertain?: The acceptability of Mauritian Creole’s elusive VA marker in future contexts

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
article

Eski fitir-la touzour insertin? Is the future still uncertain?: The acceptability of Mauritian Creole’s elusive VA marker in future contexts

article en

Abstract

Abstract Most research regarding Mauritian Creole future marking was carried out in the 1990s and assumed differences in ‘certainty’ dictated the choice of future marker ( Baker 1993 ; Hazaël-Massieux 1993 ; Touchard & Véronique 1993 ). The consensus was that the two main markers, POU and VA , were used for ‘definite’ and ‘indefinite’ future events respectively. However, this distinction was inadequately defined, and although intuitively solid, it could not account for many naturally occurring instances. Davidson (2021) quantified a range of features relevant for future expression and a new obligation meaning of VA was mentioned by some speakers. In this paper, we explore in more detail the POU/VA opposition, considering contexts with different nuances of obligation/necessity and their compatibility with VA . Overall, VA is more acceptable in contexts which can be interpreted as obligation/necessity and it is now not only restricted to indefinite or ‘less certain’ contexts.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.