Evaluation of the Dynamiker Quantitative Anti-Aspergillus Fumigatus Specific Detection for the Diagnosis of Different Kinds of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis

Bingquan Zhu,1,* Junfei Zhu,2,3,* Lingyan Sheng,2 Yake Yao,2 Hua Zhou2 1Children’s Health Care Department, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou, 324110, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Hua Zhou; Yake Yao, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: Aspergillus-specific IgG antibody test is considered to be the most reliable method for diagnosing chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA), while its diagnostic roles in different kinds of CPA are still uncertain and it is a challenge of having a threshold to interpret the IgG levels.Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the Dynamiker quantitative Aspergillus fumigatus-specific IgG antibody in different types of CPA with the aim of providing a reference for clinical work.Methods: This prospective study collected the clinical data of patients with suspected CPA admitted to the hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 and divided them into two groups: CPA and non-CPA. The study analyzed clinical characteristics and Aspergillus-specific IgG antibody test’s diagnostic value, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate diagnostic efficacy.Results: We enrolled 54 CPA patients and 132 non-CPA patients. The average admission age of the CPA group was 61.0 (43.8, 70.0) years, and the sex ratio was 32/22 (male/female). The level of Aspergillus fumigatus-specific IgG antibody in the CPA group was significantly higher than the non-CPA group (95.2 (31.3, 213.3) vs 47.5 (34.0, 80.3) AU/mL, p = 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.653 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.580– 0.721, p = 0.003). The cutoff with the best diagnostic efficacy was 87 AU/mL, and the sensitivity and specificity were 57.4% and 77.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the level of specific IgG antibody among the five CPA types (p = 0.543); however, it was relatively higher in chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis (CCPA).Conclusion: Aspergillus-specific IgG antibody is valuable diagnostic marker for CPA, while its value in differential diagnosis among different types of CPA is limited.Keywords: Aspergillus, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, IgG, subtypes, diagnosis

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-09-01
Primary Topic
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Dynamiker Quantitative Anti-Aspergillus Fumigatus Specific Detection for the Diagnosis of Different Kinds of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
article

Evaluation of the Dynamiker Quantitative Anti-Aspergillus Fumigatus Specific Detection for the Diagnosis of Different Kinds of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis

article en

Abstract

Bingquan Zhu,1,* Junfei Zhu,2,3,* Lingyan Sheng,2 Yake Yao,2 Hua Zhou2 1Children’s Health Care Department, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou, 324110, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Hua Zhou; Yake Yao, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: Aspergillus-specific IgG antibody test is considered to be the most reliable method for diagnosing chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA), while its diagnostic roles in different kinds of CPA are still uncertain and it is a challenge of having a threshold to interpret the IgG levels.Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the Dynamiker quantitative Aspergillus fumigatus-specific IgG antibody in different types of CPA with the aim of providing a reference for clinical work.Methods: This prospective study collected the clinical data of patients with suspected CPA admitted to the hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 and divided them into two groups: CPA and non-CPA. The study analyzed clinical characteristics and Aspergillus-specific IgG antibody test’s diagnostic value, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate diagnostic efficacy.Results: We enrolled 54 CPA patients and 132 non-CPA patients. The average admission age of the CPA group was 61.0 (43.8, 70.0) years, and the sex ratio was 32/22 (male/female). The level of Aspergillus fumigatus-specific IgG antibody in the CPA group was significantly higher than the non-CPA group (95.2 (31.3, 213.3) vs 47.5 (34.0, 80.3) AU/mL, p = 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.653 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.580– 0.721, p = 0.003). The cutoff with the best diagnostic efficacy was 87 AU/mL, and the sensitivity and specificity were 57.4% and 77.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the level of specific IgG antibody among the five CPA types (p = 0.543); however, it was relatively higher in chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis (CCPA).Conclusion: Aspergillus-specific IgG antibody is valuable diagnostic marker for CPA, while its value in differential diagnosis among different types of CPA is limited.Keywords: Aspergillus, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, IgG, subtypes, diagnosis

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.